Bogus purchases - department had neither disputed the assessee's ...

Tribunal Rules Department Can't Reject Purchases as Bogus Without Evidence; Limits Additions to Gross Profit Rate.

June 3, 2019

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Bogus purchases - department had neither disputed the assessee's sales nor shown any discrepancy between the purchases shown and the sales declared - the Tribunal was correct in coming to the conclusion that the purchases cannot be rejected without disturbing the sales in case of a trader - correctly restricted the additions @ of G.P. rate on purchases at the same rate of other genuine purchases

View Source

← Previous Next →

Bogus purchases - department had neither disputed the assessee's ...

Tribunal Rules Department Can't Reject Purchases as Bogus Without Evidence; Limits Additions to Gross Profit Rate.

June 3, 2019

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Bogus purchase bills from certain ‘hawala’ dealers - The Tribunal found the assessee failed to substantiate the genuineness of the purchases from alleged Hawala dealers,...

Estimation of income - bogus purchases - The Tribunal considered the facts surrounding the alleged bogus purchases. Despite the inability of the assessee to establish...

Estimation of income - bogus purchases - quantification of profit - The Tribunal noted that during investigations, the alleged suppliers were identified as bogus...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed various issues: disallowance of provisions for waste disposal expenses due to lack of evidence and scientific basis, upheld disallowance...

The ITAT Mumbai addressed two key issues in the case. Firstly, regarding the penalty u/s 271(1)(c), the tribunal held that the absence of a tick mark on the notice did...

TDS u/s 194C - payments of purchase to various vendors - Non deduction of TDS - Upon analysis, the Appellate Tribunal agreed with the assessee, ruling that the...

HC ruled in favor of revenue department, reversing lower authorities' decision to apply 12.5% estimation on bogus purchases. Assessee failed to explain source of...

The assessee provided documentary evidence supporting the purchase and subsequent sale of shares leading to long-term capital gains (LTCG). The evidence included...

CESTAT rejected appeals for default under Rule 20 of CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982, due to appellant's non-appearance at hearings without valid justification. Following...

The HC ruled against the approach of estimating profit (at 12.5%) on bogus purchases, finding it contradictory to Section 69C of the Income Tax Act. The court reasoned...

Additions towards Bogus purchases - Estimation of profit - Purchases are to be removed, the corresponding sale is also required to be removed from the profit and loss...

ITAT ruled against Revenue's addition under s153A for alleged bogus purchases. Assessment was based solely on pre-search statements from ML and DK without supporting...

The assessee had made purchases from M/s. HJM Fuels Pvt. Ltd., which the Department treated as bogus and added a profit element. The assessee pointed out discrepancies...

The appellant failed to prove the genuineness of the purchase transactions, and the goods were received from parties other than those from whom they were shown to have...

The ITAT Hyderabad held that the addition of bogus purchases based on information from the Investigation Wing was not justified. The burden of proof shifted to the AO...

Quick Updates: