Validity of notice u/s 13(2) and u/s 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act - ...

Court Dismisses Petition on SARFAESI Notices; Highlights Misuse of Protections and Territorial Jurisdiction Issues in DRT Cases.

September 10, 2015

Case Laws Indian Laws HC

Validity of notice u/s 13(2) and u/s 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act - right of the third party - Territorial Jurisdiction of Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) - the protection given by this Court is completely misused and to institute multiple proceedings - petition dismissed with cost - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Validity of notice u/s 13(2) and u/s 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act - ...

Court Dismisses Petition on SARFAESI Notices; Highlights Misuse of Protections and Territorial Jurisdiction Issues in DRT Cases.

September 10, 2015

Case Laws Indian Laws HC

You may also like:

The High Court considered the maintainability of a petition involving cheating, misappropriation of funds, and defrauding investors. The Court applied the Doctrine of...

Territorial Jurisdiction of Delhi High Court - LLP is registered in Hyderabad - It is evident from the facts of the present case that there is no principal or...

Prosecution u/s 276CC - Settlement Commission has already granted immunity from prosecution to the petitioner - The High Court highlighted the importance of the...

Territorial jurisdiction of Hon'ble Court at Rohtak - Investigation conducted by the DGGI, Rohtak - All alleged Firms/ Companies are 'Registered' under the CGST Act,...

Faceless Assessment Center u/s 144-B - territorial jurisdiction - The Court opines that the petitioner's PAN registration within U.P. establishes territorial...

The High Court held that the petitioners have the option to file writ petitions challenging the orders of the Revisionary Authority either before the High Court within...

Notice of re-assessment u/s 148 - territorial jurisdiction of High Court - writ filed in Bombay whereas notice issued by AO in Hyderabad - any challenge to the orders of...

The High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by the petitioner seeking directions to the respondents to issue a refund of Integrated Goods & Services Tax (IGST)...

The court held that the notices issued u/s 133(6) and the subsequent notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act were invalid. The petitioner had filed a reply to the notice...

The High Court addressed the issue of linking services provided by a company to its separate registered units for taxation purposes under CENVAT Credit Rules. The court...

Fraudulent input tax credit (ITC) - Vacation of interim protection granted to the petitioner - the petitioner is not joining the investigation, rather misusing the...

Maintainability of Criminal proceedings - illegal allotment of shares - illegal appointment of petitioner as a director and transfer of shares - The court highlighted...

Suspension of registration of the Resolution Professional (RP) - territorial jurisdiction to entertain the Writ Petition - Pursuant to the order of suspension, the...

Jurisdiction of High Court - The doctrine of precedents - Rule of binding efficacy of law - Revenue file appeal with P&H High court instead of Delhi High court - No...

Defective SCN - The High court observed that the show cause notice lacked clarity regarding the grounds of alleged violation and did not contain essential details such...

Quick Updates: