Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights September 2015 Year 2015 This

Levy of penalty for abetment - The Appellant is supplier of raw ...


Penalty for Abetment Deemed Unjustified for Raw Material Supplier Due to Compliance with Prescribed Procedure.

September 14, 2015

Case Laws     Central Excise     AT

Levy of penalty for abetment - The Appellant is supplier of raw material, which was received by the main noticee as per procedure prescribed. In such situation, the imposition of penalty on the appellant is unjustified. - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Job-work - duty liability of job-worker or supplier? - The duty liability can be shifted to the supplier of raw materials or semi-finished goods only if the supplier...

  2. The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving the levy of penalty u/s 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) due to the Accountant's Covid-19...

  3. Job work - The only reason for denial of the benefit of this notification as referred above is that the principal manufacturer i.e. the raw material supplier has not...

  4. Smuggling - illegal importation of the seized gold - Confiscation of the gold and Indian currency - The Tribunal found no evidence linking the seized Indian currency to...

  5. Clandestine manufacture - tobacco snuff - It is found that to manufacture snuff of huge quantity, other raw material/packing material also required but no such evidence...

  6. Job-work - who is liable to pay duty - although the job worker is a manufacturer by virtue of the exemption notification r/w declaration made by the raw materials...

  7. The appellants imported goods and procured goods from the Domestic Tariff Area (DTA) under exemption notifications, allowing import and procurement of raw materials and...

  8. The case involves penalty imposition u/s 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with statutory notices issued u/ss 143(2) and 142(1). Assessee explained non-compliance due to a...

  9. Depreciation u/s 32 – Plant ready for used but not used in actual due to unavailability of raw-material – business was a going concern and the machinery could not be...

  10. CESTAT Mumbai held that confiscation of imported goods and imposition of penalty u/s 112(a) of Customs Act for forged Special Import Licenses lacked clear evidence...

  11. Non-discharge of service tax - extended period invoked, service tax demanded - penalties imposed u/ss 77 and 78 of Finance Act, 1994 - appellant providing taxable...

  12. Validity of detention order - The petitioner argued that being a buyer from a GST-registered supplier, they had no means or obligation to verify the supplier's...

  13. Benefit of deduction u/s 80IC - Activity of processing of raw material received from HUL and then feeding the processed raw material to the mother plant of HUL - The...

  14. Concessional rate of tax (CST) 3% or 2% of CST - oxygen gas used as raw material - when it has been found that the oxygen gas is used as a ‘refining agent’ and its main...

  15. Seeking to release the raw materials, goods, stock and finished goods seized and detained by the official respondents - A mere lock and seal of the premises is not...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates