Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights June 2024 Year 2024 This

The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving the levy of ...


Assessee's appeal allowed as penalty u/s 272A(1)(d) deleted due to valid reasons. Change to digital assessment justified.

Case Laws     Income Tax

June 21, 2024

The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving the levy of penalty u/s 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) due to the Accountant's Covid-19 illness. The unproved sundry creditors were brought to tax u/s 69A r.w.s. 115BBE(1). The Tribunal held that the assessee responded to the final show cause notice during faceless assessment proceedings, explaining the delay due to the Accountant's illness. The new Accountant collected information and submitted it to the assessing officer. The Tribunal found reasonable cause for non-compliance with statutory notices u/s 142(1) and deemed the subsequent penalty unjustified. Considering the transition to digital assessment proceedings, the delay in compliance was deemed bona fide. Therefore, the penalty u/s 272A(1)(d) was deleted, and the assessee's appeal was allowed.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The Appellate Tribunal considered the imposition of penalty u/s 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1). The assessee eventually responded to the notice...

  2. Penalty u/s 272A(1)(d) - non-compliance of the notice issued u/s 142 - when this is the year of changing the mode of assessment proceedings from physical to digital...

  3. Levy of penalty u/s 272A(1)(d) - The bonafide or other wise malafide of non compliance is also required to be kept in mind. The tax and interest are statutory levies,...

  4. Penalty u/s. 272A(1)(d) - non compliance to notice u/s. 142(1) due to covid pandemic - addition u/s. 68 - As it is observed that when there is a reasonable cause for the...

  5. Penalty u/s 272A(1)(d) - non compliance to notices u/s 142(1) - The provisions of Section 272A(1)(d) is of deterrent in nature and not for earning revenue. The remedy...

  6. Levy of penalty u/s 272A(1)(d) - Non compliance to the notice(s) issued during the course of assessment proceedings - The ITAT noted that the assessee did respond to...

  7. Levy of penalty u/s 272A(1)(C) - Failure to comply to the summon issued u/s 131(1) - AO has rightly acted as per the provision of sub-Section 3 of Section 272A of the...

  8. Levying penalty u/s 272A(1) - non-compliance of the notice - Nonappearance of the assessee in response to the initial notice under section 142(1) of the Act was not...

  9. Penalty u/s 271B - non-filing of Tax audit report u/sec. 44AB of the Act within the due date under section 139(1) - Due to technical issues and pressure of work, the...

  10. Levy of penalty u/s 272A(1)(c) - failure to comply with summons u/s 131(1A) - no reasonable cause for non-compliance to the notice issued u/s 133(6) - in absence of any...

  11. Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) - failure to comply with the notices issued by the A.O u/s 142(1) - the non-compliance on the part of the assessee is due to the reason of...

  12. Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - recording of specific finding or not? - In para 7 of the penalty order u/s. 271(1)(c), the Assessing Officer held that it is found to be a fit...

  13. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - proof of contravention of provisions provided under explanation 5A to section 271(1)(c) - On reference to the provisions of explanation 5A to...

  14. The High Court quashed penalty u/s E-Way Bill violation, classifying goods as ODC due to speed without intent to evade tax. Relying on precedent, mens rea is essential...

  15. Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) and / or 272A(1)(d) - assessee failed to comply notice under Section 142(1) - The assessment order was passed u/s 143(3) and not under...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates