Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - the addition made by the Assessing ...

Penalty Confirmed for Concealment of Income u/s 271(1)(c); Assessee's Explanation Not Bona Fide.

September 23, 2015

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - the addition made by the Assessing Officer was specific and assessee had concealed the income and furnished inaccurate particulars of income. - the assessee's explanation is not bonafide - levy of penalty confirmed - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - the addition made by the Assessing ...

Penalty Confirmed for Concealment of Income u/s 271(1)(c); Assessee's Explanation Not Bona Fide.

September 23, 2015

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed despite the assessee withdrawing the exemption claim u/s 10(38) for Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) on sale of penny stocks and offering...

Imposition of Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The explanation given by the assessee for the depreciation claim, is neither bona-fide, nor substantiated - penalty confirmed - HC

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - failure on the part of legal heir of the deceased assessee to explain the source of part of the deposits - The mere failure on the part of the...

Penalty u/s 271(a)(c) - The explanation filed by the assessee about not disclosing interest income in the return of income was not bona fide - levy of penalty confirmed - AT

Non-filer assessee had taxable income but failed to file return u/s 139(1), later filed return in response to notice u/s 148 without considering section 50C provisions,...

The ITAT held that penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was not imposable on the assessee. The assessee had voluntarily paid tax on income from sale of shares three years prior to...

Voluntary surrender of income by assessee cannot be considered concealment. AO failed to prove concealment, merely concluded voluntary surrender as concealment....

Explanation versus bona finde explanation versus proper disclosure - Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - AT

The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The Assessee did not disclose non-eligibility...

This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - disallowance of depreciation - he explanation given by the assessee for the claim of depreciation is neither bona fide nor...

Levy of Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - The ITAT ruled that since there was no variation between the returned and assessed income, there was no concealment of income by the...

Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - there is concealment of income from the HUF, i.e., knowingly the assessee furnished inaccurate particulars of income for computation...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - proof of contravention of provisions provided under explanation 5A to section 271(1)(c) - On reference to the provisions of explanation 5A to...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

Quick Updates: