Imposition of penalty - In the instant case, duty had already ...

Penalty Imposed Despite Pre-Notice Payment; Appellant Entitled to 25% Reduction Due to Duty Paid Before Show Cause Notice.

October 8, 2015

Case Laws Central Excise HC

Imposition of penalty - In the instant case, duty had already been paid before the issuance of show cause notice. The appellant was therefore entitled to pay 25% penalty only. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Imposition of penalty - In the instant case, duty had already ...

Penalty Imposed Despite Pre-Notice Payment; Appellant Entitled to 25% Reduction Due to Duty Paid Before Show Cause Notice.

October 8, 2015

Case Laws Central Excise HC

You may also like:

Mis-declaration of quantity and value of goods in SEZ unit - penalty u/ss 112(a) and 114A of Customs Act 1962. Option for reduced 25% penalty u/s 114A to be extended if...

Levy of Penalty u/s 112 - Scope of the show cause notice - The CESTAT noted that, no show cause notice has been issued proposing the demand of differential duty or the...

Imposition of penalty u/r 25 of CER - Second stage Dealer - Violation in respect of issuing Invoice - proper invoices were not issued and consequently, there is...

Since Appellant were paying the duty utilizing the CENVAT Credit they cannot be charged for contravention of the provisions of Rule 4, 8(1), 8(3) & 8(3A) of the Central...

Penalty under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - Contravention of Rule 8(3A) - penalty under Rule 25 is not permissible, but penalty under Rule 27 is to be imposed - AT

Non-discharge of service tax - extended period invoked, service tax demanded - penalties imposed u/ss 77 and 78 of Finance Act, 1994 - appellant providing taxable...

Waiver of penalty in excess of 25% - irregularity in availing Cenvat Credit - it is clear that the appellant had paid duty along with interest and 25% of penalty on...

Penalty u/r 25 or 26 of CER - Mentioning wrong rule number - The first appellate authority was not correct in holding that mentioning Rule 25 was a typographical error...

Benefit of reduced penalty u/s 78 - the appellant had failed to deposit 25% of the imposed penalty before the issuance of show cause notice or within 30 days of...

Penalty – The disclosure of duty liability in the return and payment of duty along with interest before the issuance of show cause notices cannot invite penalty under Rule 25 - HC

Benefit of reduced penalty - penalty not deposited - get the benefit of reduced penalty of 25% of the service tax (ST) u/s 78(1) of the FA, 1994, assessee required to...

The Appellant sought payment of its pre-CIRP dues from the Respondent in a manner different from the approved resolution plan, which provided for payment of pre-CIRP...

Reduction in the quantum of penalty imposed u/s 78 - Unless the penalty under Section 78 of the Act itself is leviable on the Assessee, there is no question of any...

Benefit of reduced penalty - When the legislature specifically fixes the time limit within which the duty with interest and penalty at 25% is to be paid for availing the...

Option to Deposit Dues Along with Interest and 25% of penalty - Since the option has been extended to the appellant to pay 25% of the penalty along with interest and...

Quick Updates: