The penalty imposed on the employees of the appellant company ...

Case Laws Central Excise

October 19, 2015

The penalty imposed on the employees of the appellant company cannot be sustained for the reason that they worked on the basis of the instruction of the employer. There is no material available the employees of the appellant company had gained in any manner - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

The penalty imposed on the employees of the appellant company ...

Case Laws Central Excise

October 19, 2015

You may also like:

Levy of Penalty u/s 112 - Scope of the show cause notice - The CESTAT noted that, no show cause notice has been issued proposing the demand of differential duty or the...

Levy of penalty - Applicability of ration of decision made in the case of co-noticee - in absence of the appeal by revenue against this order the order has acquired...

Levy of penalties u/ss 122 and 129 of CGST/SGST Acts - expiry of e-way bill - mens rea in penalty imposition. Technically, violation of law by petitioner in transporting...

The court quashed the impugned orders rejecting the appeal as the appellate authority failed to assign any reasons, violating principles of natural justice. It is...

Imposition of penalty under Section 78 - Merely because penalty under Section 78 has been imposed for the earlier period, no penalty can be imposed for any subsequent...

Levy of penalty u/s 114(i) of the Customs Act, 1962 - Smuggling - The reason for imposing the impugned penalty is that the appellant has not verified the Let Export...

Levy of service tax - Works contract services - demand on the basis of 26AS statements - it is found that the show cause notice was issued in violation of instruction...

Levy of penalty - Generalia specialibus non derogant - levy of special penalty over general penalty - the Commissioner perfectly justified in imposing penalty under...

Construction Services - composite Works Contracts - for sole reason of not filing the intimation opting to pay service under Works Contract Service, the demand cannot sustain.

Disallowance of interest relating to Capital Work in Progress (CWIP) - The Appellant has furnished the relevant working capital facility agreements and ledger account to...

Levy of penalty for abetment - penalty cannot be imposed merely on the basis of assumption and presumption and without any basis - HC

Levy of penalty u/s 112 and 117 of CA on CHA and G card holder - mis-classification and mis-declaration of goods - The negligence of both the appellants herein is...

Non-discharge of service tax - extended period invoked, service tax demanded - penalties imposed u/ss 77 and 78 of Finance Act, 1994 - appellant providing taxable...

Levy of penalty on Proprietor of the Firm under Rule 26(2) of Central Excise Rules, 2002 - fraudulent availment of CENVAT Credit - Taking note of the fact that penalty...

Penalty imposed u/s 271(1)(c) read with section 274 - It may be a good case for quantum addition but not for imposing penalty. Estimation is outcome of subjective...

Quick Updates: