Imposition of Penalty - benefit of Vishesh Krishi Upaj Yojana - ...

Penalty Imposed for Forged Claims Under Vishesh Krishi Upaj Yojana; Section 114AA Applied Without Goods Movement Requirement.

December 7, 2015

Case Laws Customs AT

Imposition of Penalty - benefit of Vishesh Krishi Upaj Yojana - Benifit on the basis of forged bills - for the purpose of Section 114AA movement or existence of goods is not necessary - levy of penalty confirmed - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Imposition of Penalty - benefit of Vishesh Krishi Upaj Yojana - ...

Penalty Imposed for Forged Claims Under Vishesh Krishi Upaj Yojana; Section 114AA Applied Without Goods Movement Requirement.

December 7, 2015

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

Purchase from 100% EOU and export - 100% EOU are not entitled for export incentives and exemption - Vishesh Krishi Upaj Yojna - the medium of the appellant cannot be...

Exemption u/s 10B - Profits on sale of incentives received from the Ministry of Commerce, Government of India - Vishesh Krishi Upaj Yojna - assessee is not entitled to...

Levy of Penalty u/s 112 - Scope of the show cause notice - The CESTAT noted that, no show cause notice has been issued proposing the demand of differential duty or the...

Levy of penalties u/ss 122 and 129 of CGST/SGST Acts - expiry of e-way bill - mens rea in penalty imposition. Technically, violation of law by petitioner in transporting...

The claim of the appellant (Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti) that the allotment of shop or land to the traders cannot be considered as “renting of immovable property” is not tenable.

Benefit of Vishesh Krishi Upaj Yojana scheme - exporters of Menthol and Mentha Oil - export of value added products under the description “Mentha Arvensis” -...

Imposition of penalty under Section 78 - Merely because penalty under Section 78 has been imposed for the earlier period, no penalty can be imposed for any subsequent...

The High Court quashed the orders of the Appellate and Adjudicating Authorities imposing penalty on the petitioner for transporting goods after the expiry of the e-way...

Levy of penalty - Generalia specialibus non derogant - levy of special penalty over general penalty - the Commissioner perfectly justified in imposing penalty under...

Penalty imposed on trader for importing goods with invalid import declaration form (Form XVI) instead of prescribed Form XVI u/s 48A of Uttarakhand VAT Act. Tribunal...

The Appellate Tribunal held that for penalty u/s 270A, there must be satisfaction by the AO about concealment of income or inaccurate particulars. Citing Golden Peace...

Non-fulfilment of export obligation under Advance Authorization by importer company. Penalty imposed on directors solely based on their shareholding and directorship,...

The period of limitation of one year does not apply when the amount claimed as refund has been paid under protest. Section 27 of the Customs Act, 1962, only recognizes...

Levy of penalty u/s 112 and 117 of CA on CHA and G card holder - mis-classification and mis-declaration of goods - The negligence of both the appellants herein is...

Sec 112 (a) of the Customs Act 1962 has been mentioned for imposing penalty in the SCN but Adjudicating authority has imposed penalty under Sec 114 without giving any...

Quick Updates: