Imposition of Penalty - benefit of Vishesh Krishi Upaj Yojana - ...

Case Laws Customs

December 7, 2015

Imposition of Penalty - benefit of Vishesh Krishi Upaj Yojana - Benifit on the basis of forged bills - for the purpose of Section 114AA movement or existence of goods is not necessary - levy of penalty confirmed - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Imposition of Penalty - benefit of Vishesh Krishi Upaj Yojana - ...

Case Laws Customs

December 7, 2015

You may also like:

Benefit of Vishesh Krishi Upaj Yojana scheme - exporters of Menthol and Mentha Oil - export of value added products under the description “Mentha Arvensis” -...

Regarding Exemption under Vishesh Krishi and Gram Udyog Yojana (VKGUY). - Notification

Purchase from 100% EOU and export - 100% EOU are not entitled for export incentives and exemption - Vishesh Krishi Upaj Yojna - the medium of the appellant cannot be...

CESTAT Mumbai held that confiscation of imported goods and imposition of penalty u/s 112(a) of Customs Act for forged Special Import Licenses lacked clear evidence...

Entitlement for deduction U/s 80IB - amount under the head VKGUY [Vishesh Krishi Gram Udhyog Yojana] and on account of DEPB - these benefits do not form part of the net...

Exemption u/s 10B - Profits on sale of incentives received from the Ministry of Commerce, Government of India - Vishesh Krishi Upaj Yojna - assessee is not entitled to...

Amendments in the Vishesh Krishi and Gram Udyog Yojana (VKGUY) and Focus Product Scheme (FPS) of Chapter 3 of Foreign Trade Policy 2009-14 - Appendix 37A and Appendix...

Amendments in the Vishesh Krishi and Gram Udyog Yojana (VKGUY) of Chapter 3 of Foreign Trade Policy 2009-14 - Appendix 37A of Handbook of Procedure (Vol. I). - Public Notice

DEPB benefit - benefit obtained on the basis of forged documents - The liability of duty cannot be fastened on the appellant being a bona fide purchaser of DEPB scrips

The case involved a dispute over penalty imposition u/ss 271(1)(c) versus 271(1B) for additions related to estimated income from share trading transactions. The...

The claim of the appellant (Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti) that the allotment of shop or land to the traders cannot be considered as “renting of immovable property” is not tenable.

Jurisdiction - power of Additional Director General of DRI to issue SCN - Penalties were imposed under section 114, 114A and 114 AA of Customs Act - The SCN under...

Insertion of new section 270A - Penalty for underreporting and misreporting of income. - no addition or disallowance of an amount shall form the basis for imposition of...

The case before CESTAT New Delhi involved fraudulent registration and utilization of duty-free scrips, leading to penalties. The appellant failed to comply with...

Levy of penalties u/ss 122 and 129 of CGST/SGST Acts - expiry of e-way bill - mens rea in penalty imposition. Technically, violation of law by petitioner in transporting...

Quick Updates: