Doctrine of unjust enrichment - It is seen from the extract of ...

Refund Denied: Excise Duty on Gauges Passed to Consumers, Preventing Unjust Enrichment Under C.A. Certificate.

March 29, 2016

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Doctrine of unjust enrichment - It is seen from the extract of the C.A. certificate that the excise duty paid in respect of gauges was charged as expenditure during the respective years. The fact that it has been charged as expenditure indicate the facts that the same has been recovered from the customer. - Refund not allowed - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Doctrine of unjust enrichment - It is seen from the extract of ...

Refund Denied: Excise Duty on Gauges Passed to Consumers, Preventing Unjust Enrichment Under C.A. Certificate.

March 29, 2016

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Refund - unjust enrichment - excise duty has not been claimed from the buyer of the goods and the same has been reflected in “Excise Duty Refund Receivable Account” -...

Excess duty paid due to issuance of credit notes to dealers and stockists after clearance of goods was rejected on grounds of incidence being passed on and lack of...

Refund claim - rejection on the grounds of unjust enrichment - The tribunal noted that invoices presented by the appellant showed the duty being passed onto the...

Refund claim - excise duty paid wrongly - The entry was made debiting the excise duty without actually collecting the excise duty - they have not paid the excise duty...

The High Court considered a case involving the refund of excise duty paid by a company and the principles of unjust enrichment. The issue was whether the company...

Refund of wrongly paid Central Excise Duty on Retail Sale Price (Maximum Retail Price-MRP) - unjust enrichment - The authorities concluded that the appellant had passed...

Show cause notice demanding interest was confirmed by the original Adjudicating Authority and settled under SVLDRS Scheme, thus refund of the confirmed amount does not...

The CESTAT examined the applicability of the doctrine of unjust enrichment u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, for refund claims. It held that Rule 6(3) of the CCR...

Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - Duty paid twice - e appellants are entitled for refund claim for duty paid on Ethanol - unjust enrichment is not applicable - AT

Refund of Excise Duty - Unjust enrichment - The moment it raised the invoice on M/s.IOCL and M/s.IOCL issued Invoice on M/s.PPN, the incidence of Excise Duty is...

The appellant sought refund of countervailing duty (CVD) paid while importing goods declared as 'Natural gum in raw form' through Bills of Entry filed during 2011-2014....

Unjust enrichment - refund claim - bar of unjust enrichment not applicable to imported capital goods used captively by the importer - refund cannot be denied.

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - merely because the Excise duty is booked as expenditure in Profit & Loss account, it cannot be said the incidence of duty has been passed on - AT

Refund claim alongwith interest - duty paid under protest - unjust enrichment - As from the facts itself, it is clear that the appellants were not required to pay any...

Principles of unjust enrichment - Refund amount ordered to be credited to the Consumer Welfare Fund instead of being paid to the appellant - The Tribunal interprets...

Quick Updates: