Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - by showing a non existing liability as ...

High Court Upholds Penalty for Misrepresentation of Non-Existing Liability u/ss 271(1)(c) and 41(1) of Income Tax Act.

June 23, 2016

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - by showing a non existing liability as an existing liability, in the subject assessment year, the attempt was to escape offering of the ceased liability as income obliged to do under Section 41(1 - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - by showing a non existing liability as ...

High Court Upholds Penalty for Misrepresentation of Non-Existing Liability u/ss 271(1)(c) and 41(1) of Income Tax Act.

June 23, 2016

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non-compliance of notice issues - if the quantum proceedings itself are declared to be bad in law and quashed , then any non compliance on the...

The assessing officer made an addition u/s 41(1) on the grounds that the assessee had ceased trading liabilities, even though the assessee did not respond to...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal deleted the penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) for non-compliance with a notice issued u/s 142(1) during reassessment proceedings....

The case involved a dispute over penalty imposition u/ss 271(1)(c) versus 271(1B) for additions related to estimated income from share trading transactions. The...

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

Non-filer assessee had taxable income but failed to file return u/s 139(1), later filed return in response to notice u/s 148 without considering section 50C provisions,...

Addition u/s 41(1) - non verification of static sundry creditors for several years - if said liability exists in books of assessee, and has not been written off...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - CIT(A) has given direction to the Assessing Officer to levy penalty equivalent to 100% tax under section 271(1)(c) of the Act. Mere estimate of...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - recording of specific finding or not? - In para 7 of the penalty order u/s. 271(1)(c), the Assessing Officer held that it is found to be a fit...

Addition u/s 41(1) - AO alleged that liability is non-existent - section 41(1) can be invoked provided there is trading liability in existence - in absence of any...

Penalty u/s.271(1)(b) - no compliance to notice u/s 142(1) - The AO levied the penalty for non-compliance of notice dated 13.06.2016, however, there is no reference of...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non recording of satisfaction - When satisfaction for initiation of penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of IT Act is recorded by the AO in...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that every non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) gives a separate cause of action for levying penalty u/s 271(1)(b)....

Quick Updates: