Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights March 2019 Year 2019 This

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non recording of satisfaction - When ...

Case Laws     Income Tax

March 2, 2019

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non recording of satisfaction - When satisfaction for initiation of penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of IT Act is recorded by the AO in assessment order in respect of certain additions and not recorded in respect of certain other additions; it acts as a bar against levy of penalty U/s 271(1)(c) in respect of those additions in respect of which such satisfaction was not recorded in the assessment order or during the assessment proceedings

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Levy of penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - Addition of LTCG - Assessing Officer while recording satisfaction has invoked both the charges of section 271(1)(c) - ambiguity and...

  2. Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - Credit capital account with the narration ‘Gift received’ - There is no merit in the levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act...

  3. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was levied by the Assessing Officer solely based on the order of the Income Tax Settlement Commission withdrawing immunity from penalty and...

  4. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - recording of satisfaction - penalty initiated u/s 143(3) order for concealment of particulars of income - penalty imposed for furnishing of...

  5. Levy penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - since no specific satisfaction has been recorded by the Ld. Assessing Officer either in the body of the assessment order or in the show...

  6. The assessment order passed u/s 153C was erroneous and prejudicial to the Revenue's interest. The Assessing Officer initiated penalty proceedings u/s 271AAC instead of...

  7. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - recording of satisfaction - mere direction in the assessment order to initiate penalty proceedings - Concealment/furnishing inaccurate...

  8. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - the assessment order, by a fiction of law, is deemed to constitute satisfaction of the Assessing Officer for initiation of penalty proceedings - HC

  9. Penalty u/s 271(1)(C) - manadation of recording satisfaction which limb of the provisions of Section 271(1)(c) of the Act was triggered - In a given case, both limbs may...

  10. Penalty u/s. 271(1)(b) - validity of notice - non recording of satisfaction - a proposal to initiate penalty proceedings is not equivalent to recording a satisfaction...

  11. Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - recording of specific finding or not? - In para 7 of the penalty order u/s. 271(1)(c), the Assessing Officer held that it is found to be a fit...

  12. The Assessing Officer (AO) consciously deleted irrelevant portions from the show cause notice, mentioning only the charge of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income....

  13. Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - non comply with the notice issued u/s 142(1)- Once on record it is proved that notice was complied with, no penalty 271(1)(b) for non...

  14. The Appellate Tribunal considered the issue of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. It was questioned whether a precise charge was brought against the assessee and if the...

  15. Section 271(1)(c) penalty was held invalid due to improper issuance of notice, as no proceedings were pending when the notice was issued on 19.12.2019. Section 271A...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates