Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights July 2016 Year 2016 This

Claim of rebate/refund - Procedure of A.R.E.-1 followed instead ...

Case Laws     Central Excise

July 10, 2016

Claim of rebate/refund - Procedure of A.R.E.-1 followed instead of A.R.E-2 as contended by the department - There is no independent evidences on record to show that the applicant have exported the goods without payment of duty under ARE-2 or under Bond. Under such circumstances, Government finds force in contention of applicant that they have by mistake ticked in ARE-I form declaration - matter remanded back for verification - CGOVT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Adjustment of refund claim (rebate claim on export of goods) with demand stayed by the CESTAT

  2. Research and Development expenses (R&D Expenses) - Allowability of expenses u/s 35(2) - The expenses are not covered u/s 35(2) - The assessee has not claimed the same...

  3. Claiming special rebate in terms of Section 12(1) of the KVAT Act, 2003 - The petitioner was entitled for rebate for the entire amount paid in terms of Section 12(1) and...

  4. Refund claim - Export of goods - refund claims have to be filed shipping bill-wise or not - a conjoint reading of the Notification and the Form A-1 appended to the...

  5. The High Court held that the revisional authority's order placing the refund sanction order in abeyance u/s 108 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 was...

  6. Rebate claims - export of goods - defect in the original application - Bar of limitation - neither Rule 18 nor notification of GOI prescribe any procedure for claiming...

  7. Denial of rebate claim - applicant cleared the goods by following self sealing procedure, and good were not physically examined at the port of export - rebate cannot be...

  8. This order authorizes Income-tax authorities to admit applications or claims for refund and carry forward of loss u/s 119(2)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It...

  9. The jurisdictional Assessing Officer (AO) had suo moto transferred the assessment to Income Tax Officer (ITO), Ward 2(2) Noida. The appellant contended that the...

  10. Claim of rebate / Refund in cash - rebate claim sanctioned by way of credit to Cenvat account - Export of Services - Cash refund allowed - AT

  11. Denial of rebate claim - failure to follow the mandatory procedure for export - Simply ticking a wrong declaration in ARE-1 form cannot be a basis for rejecting the...

  12. Refund of excess amount lying to the credit of electronic cash ledger of the petitioner - applicability of proviso to sub-section (1) of Section 54 or sub-section (1) of...

  13. Refund claim - supply of goods to SEZ unit - the appellants have failed to follow the procedure which is prescribed in the SEZ Act for claiming exemption - appellants...

  14. Amendment in Policy condition No. 2 (iii) to Chapter 95 of ITC(HS), 2017-Schedule 1 (Import Policy) – Procedure to be followed for clearance of toys

  15. Rebate claim – refund claim was time barred - rebate claim was rightly rejected as time barred but the re-credit of duty paid in Cenvat account is not admissible - CGOVT

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates