There cannot be one order of assessment by AO for the same ...

Court Rules AO and Commission Cannot Issue Separate Orders for Same Assessment Period, Avoiding Overlapping Jurisdictions.

October 22, 2016

Case Laws Income Tax HC

There cannot be one order of assessment by AO for the same period for which the Commission would also pass the order of settlement. Accepting the contention that even if the order of assessment has been passed by the AO, his case may still be deemed to be pending since such order was not dispatched or served, would lead to a conflicting situation - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

There cannot be one order of assessment by AO for the same ...

Court Rules AO and Commission Cannot Issue Separate Orders for Same Assessment Period, Avoiding Overlapping Jurisdictions.

October 22, 2016

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

The High Court examined the validity of an assessment order issued without considering the reply submitted by the assessee in response to a Show Cause Notice. It was...

The Rajasthan High Court examined the validity of revision proceedings u/s 263 concerning the period of limitation. The issue was whether the period of limitation for...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Earlier, ITAT remanded the matter back requesting the AO to provide reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings. - AO must have...

The High Court held that the Assessing Officer's failure to frame a draft assessment order and directly passing a final order was violative of the mandatory provisions...

The Delhi High Court examined the validity of an order passed u/s 92CA and jurisdiction to pass an assessment order post-limitation period. The court held that once the...

The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the show-cause notice dated 20.08.2024 issued by the respondent authority in relation to the refund of integrated taxes...

The High Court held that the faceless assessment order was invalid as it violated the principles of natural justice and the provisions of Section 144B of the Income Tax...

Refusal to rectify the assessment order passed under Rule 142 (5) of the C.G.S.T. Rules, 2017 - denial of the Input Tax Credit (ITC) - The High Court found merit in the...

Validity of assessment order - Jurisdiction to AO to adjudicate the assessment u/s 143(3) - While quashing the notice, High Court has granted the liberty to the...

This case deals with the applicability of Section 153, the limitation provision, to proceedings u/s 144C of the Income Tax Act. The key issues are whether the 11-month...

The Assessing Officer (AO) issued a corrigendum correcting the total income in the original assessment order. The AO has the power to withdraw, modify or substitute an...

Revision u/s 263 - once the AO cannot examine any other issue except the issue as selected for limited scrutiny assessment, the PCIT can examine the only issue which was...

Petitioner availed alternate remedy of filing substantive appeal against assessment order and notices issued u/ss 148A and 148 of the Act. Court held that if assessment...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - The High Court noted that the issue of disallowance under Section 14A of the Act had been thoroughly examined during the original...

Revision u/s 263 - Period of limitation - To be commenced from original assessment order or re-assessment order u/s 147 - In the case on hand, the jurisdiction under...

Quick Updates: