Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights October 2024 Year 2024 This

Petitioner availed alternate remedy of filing substantive appeal ...


Taxpayer urged to pursue appeal against assessment order, notices despite alleged illegality under Hexaware, Siemens precedents.

Case Laws     Income Tax

October 17, 2024

Petitioner availed alternate remedy of filing substantive appeal against assessment order and notices issued u/ss 148A and 148 of the Act. Court held that if assessment order and notices are contrary to Sections 151A and 151 as interpreted in Hexaware and Siemens, Appellate and Revisionary Authorities, being bound by jurisdictional High Court's decisions, must consider legal position. Petitioner can raise contentions regarding illegality of assessment order and notice u/s 148 before said authorities. Court opined that when Appellate Authority is seized with proceedings, entertaining writ petitions to adjudicate issues which can be decided by Appellate Authority considering Court's decisions would create situation where all such matters would require Court's intervention. Hence, Court held petitioner should pursue pending proceedings before Appellate and Revisionary Authorities. Court not persuaded to entertain present petition assailing assessment order when appeal and revision are already pending.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Tax assessment order set aside due to defects in show cause notice, failure to consider Covid-19 impact on business operations. Taxpayer engaged in milk manufacturing...

  2. The Appellate Tribunal upheld the addition u/s 68 for alleged bogus Long Term Capital Gains due to off-market cash purchase of shares. The taxpayer's claim for deduction...

  3. Royalty - Payment received by the taxpayer from British Airways in relation to alleged use of 'Altea system' cannot be characterized as 'royalty' either under the Act or...

  4. Tax authority rejected rectification application filed by taxpayer for zero-rated supply citing violation of principles of natural justice. Court examined impugned...

  5. Refund of CGST & SGST wrongly paid - Interpretation of the term “subsequently held” - the term “subsequently held” in section 77 of CGST Act, 2017 or under section 19 of...

  6. The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of alleged bogus long-term capital gain u/s 10(38) concerning a transaction involving shares of a company flagged as a penny...

  7. The Delhi High Court reviewed a case concerning excess Input Tax Credit claimed by a taxpayer by comparing GSTR-2A with GSTR-3B. The court noted the lack of cooperation...

  8. Maintainability of petition discussed - availability of alternative remedy considered - cancellation of registration under CGST/APGST Act, 2017 - alleged violation of...

  9. Validity of impugned order u/s 73 of the CGST Act - The case before the Calcutta High Court involved a challenge to an order issued under the CGST Act, wherein the...

  10. Estimation of income - bogus purchases - quantification of profit - The Tribunal noted that during investigations, the alleged suppliers were identified as bogus...

  11. The taxpayer, an IT/support services provider, received reimbursements from its associated enterprises (AEs) for the cost of providing such services. The tax authorities...

  12. Order passed by Proper Officer u/s 74(9) of West Bengal GST/CGST Act, 2017 subsequent to demise of registered taxpayer held unenforceable. Show cause notice issued,...

  13. The ITAT, an Appellate Tribunal, ruled on unexplained cash deposits in bank accounts opened by a CA misusing KYC documents. The CA, acting fraudulently, used the...

  14. The ITAT, an Appellate Tribunal, considered an addition u/s 69 concerning a difference in agreed and actual deal value, attributed to unexplained source of stamp duty...

  15. The Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) considered whether the Central Processing Centre (CPC) was justified in denying the benefit of the New Tax Regime to an individual taxpayer...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates