Levy of penalty for not following procedure for movement of ...

Penalty Imposed for Non-Compliance with Vehicle Movement Procedure Under VAT Laws; Punching Requirement Violated.

November 24, 2016

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax HC

Levy of penalty for not following procedure for movement of vehicle carrying goods - the punching having been introduced in VAT laws as an additional feature, it is also required to be taken care of by the assessee, that the punching is to be done and if not then there is a serious deficiency. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of penalty for not following procedure for movement of ...

Penalty Imposed for Non-Compliance with Vehicle Movement Procedure Under VAT Laws; Punching Requirement Violated.

November 24, 2016

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax HC

You may also like:

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that every non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) gives a separate cause of action for levying penalty u/s 271(1)(b)....

Non-discharge of service tax - extended period invoked, service tax demanded - penalties imposed u/ss 77 and 78 of Finance Act, 1994 - appellant providing taxable...

Securities Contracts (Regulation) (Procedure for Holding Inquiry and Imposing Penalties by Adjudicating Officer) (Amendment) Rules, 2019

Depositories (Procedure for Holding Inquiry and Imposing Penalties by Adjudicating Officer) (Amendment) Rules, 2019

Validity of penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) - non-compliance - The assessee has shown sufficient cause for non-compliance, moreover, such non-compliance was done by...

Levy of penalties u/ss 122 and 129 of CGST/SGST Acts - expiry of e-way bill - mens rea in penalty imposition. Technically, violation of law by petitioner in transporting...

Levy of Penalty u/s 112 - Scope of the show cause notice - The CESTAT noted that, no show cause notice has been issued proposing the demand of differential duty or the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non-compliance of notice issues - if the quantum proceedings itself are declared to be bad in law and quashed , then any non compliance on the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - Default by assessee - mens rea is not an essential element for imposing penalty for non compliance of notices issued by AO - penalty confirmed - AT

Levy of penalty - Generalia specialibus non derogant - levy of special penalty over general penalty - the Commissioner perfectly justified in imposing penalty under...

Procedure for movement of goods under TIR Carnets-reg.

The case involves penalty imposition u/s 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with statutory notices issued u/ss 143(2) and 142(1). Assessee explained non-compliance due to a...

Non-fulfilment of export obligation under Advance Authorization by importer company. Penalty imposed on directors solely based on their shareholding and directorship,...

Imposition of penalty under Section 78 - Merely because penalty under Section 78 has been imposed for the earlier period, no penalty can be imposed for any subsequent...

Penalty order u/s 272A(1)(d) - No co-operation from assessee's side - To the mind of this Bench, ‘non-cooperative attitude’ as such in itself cannot be the basis of...

Quick Updates: