Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights September 2013 Year 2013 This

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - Default by assessee - mens rea is not an ...

Case Laws     Income Tax

September 5, 2013

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - Default by assessee - mens rea is not an essential element for imposing penalty for non compliance of notices issued by AO - penalty confirmed - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. To impose penalty u/s 271(1)(c), willful concealment is not an essential ingredient - HC

  2. Levy of penalty u/s 54(1)(2) of the U.P. VAT Act, 2008 - men-rea - The Court concluded that mens rea is indeed an essential prerequisite for imposing a penalty under...

  3. Penalty imposed by the Settlement Commission u/s 271(1)(c) - The petitioner argued against the penalty, citing lack of mens rea and the absence of evidence showing...

  4. Validity of penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) - non-compliance - The assessee has shown sufficient cause for non-compliance, moreover, such non-compliance was done by...

  5. Penalty u/s 271(1(c) - With the omission of the expression ‘deliberately’, mens rea is no longer a prerequisite for imposition of penalty - penalty under Section...

  6. Levy of penalties u/ss 122 and 129 of CGST/SGST Acts - expiry of e-way bill - mens rea in penalty imposition. Technically, violation of law by petitioner in transporting...

  7. This case deals with the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, imposed for disallowance of losses on forex derivatives treated as speculative losses and...

  8. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The considerations for imposition of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act are however entirely different. It requires existence of mens rea...

  9. Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

  10. This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

  11. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Non specification of charge - defective notice - as the A.O had clearly failed to discharge his statutory obligation of fairly putting the...

  12. Non-filer assessee had taxable income but failed to file return u/s 139(1), later filed return in response to notice u/s 148 without considering section 50C provisions,...

  13. Recovery of damages - failure to deposit the contribution of EPF or committed default as mandated under the provisions of the Employees Provident Fund & Miscellaneous...

  14. Penalty levied u/s 271(I)(c) - Whether "Mens rea" is apparent in this case? - where the two regular appellate authorities have granted the relief to the Assessee by...

  15. Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates