No action having ever been initiated by the APIIC to raise a ...

Case Laws Companies Law

February 1, 2017

No action having ever been initiated by the APIIC to raise a dispute as to its liability to pay the amount aforestated or as to delayed discharge of contractual obligations by the company petitioner, it is too late in the day for it to now raise the ruse of a bonafide dispute to ward off the summary proceedings initiated under the Act of 1956 for its winding up. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

No action having ever been initiated by the APIIC to raise a ...

Case Laws Companies Law

February 1, 2017

You may also like:

Initiation of CIRP - existence of debt and pre-existing dispute or not - When no action is initiated in respect of the said mismanagement, projecting the mismanagement...

SVLDRS - Right of the petitioner to get deduction of deposits made prior to the issuance of show cause notice - Amount deposited by the petitioner falls in the second...

Interest liability - delay in furnishing GSTR-3B return - Liability imposed without any adjudication proceeding u/s 73 or 74 - despite disputing the liability towards...

Initiation of CIRP - pre-existence of dispute - There was no dispute existing prior to the first demand notice and only disputes raised prior to the first demand notice...

Eligibility to make adjustment of excess service tax paid against future service tax liability - Claim of Excess service tax paid due to issuance of revised invoice -...

The court held that Section 6(2)(b) of the Act treats the empowered officers under the SGST/UGST Act at the central level to be at par and does not prescribe for...

Initiation of CIRP - Operational Creditors - existence of pre-existing dispute or not - Careful reading of Section 8(2)(a) of the Code provides that the existence of...

Deduction of Interest liability - merely because assessee has disputed its liability it can can not be held as un-ascertained liability - interest liability of earlier...

Initiation of CIRP - It is well settled that in Section 9 proceeding, there is no need to enter into final adjudication with regard to existence of dispute between the...

Maintainability of application - initiation of CIRP - The present is a case where we are satisfied that there is no dispute, in fact, prior to issuance of Section 8...

Maintainability of Section 9 application - pre-existing dispute - admittedly 97 % of the amount due for the invoices raised by the Appellant was paid and 3 % of the...

Addition u/s 41(1) - it is undisputed fact that the remission of liability would be only of the amount payable and not of the amounts paid by the assessee. These amounts...

Winding up petition – Inability to pay debt - One of the tests to determine whether the dispute is genuine, and real and is raised bona fide and whether the refusal...

Refund - amount which was paid during the course of investigation - It is the case of the petitioner that the amount was paid under coercion - There is no merits in this...

Adjustment of amount of the duty demanded against the EOU unit - goods manufactured in EOU sold in DTA unit - The stand of respondent no.2 cannot be accepted that even...

Quick Updates: