Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - estimation was not made on the basis of ...

Case Laws Income Tax

February 28, 2017

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - estimation was not made on the basis of unverifiable transactions but the estimation of income was based on specific transactions carried out fraudulently and proved as bogus with supporting material evidences found in the case of assessee - levy of penalty confirmed - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - estimation was not made on the basis of ...

Case Laws Income Tax

February 28, 2017

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - estimation of income - bogus purchases - penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act cannot be levied where the addition is made on estimate basis - AT

Levy of Penalty u/s 271AAA or u/s 271(1)(c) - whether addition is made on estimation basis or on the basis of certain evidences, fact remains that the additions made in...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of bogus purchases by applying the profit rate - Once there is no reason to disbelieve the sales made by the assessee and...

The ITAT Mumbai ruled on penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for estimation of income on bogus purchases. The tribunal held that penalty cannot be levied on additions made on an...

MAT is paid, additions were made to regular income, penalty not levied – 115JB, 271(1)(c)

This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - difference of income in the return filed u/s.139(1) and 153A - there was no such allegation that of assessee was found to be the owner of any...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act is leviable to be imposed only where the assessee has concealed its particulars of income or furnished...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that no penalty u/s 271(1)(c) can be imposed for an ad-hoc disallowance of 20% of expenses made by the Assessing Officer....

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - bogus purchases @ 25% on total purchase - After analyzing the order of the A.O. as well as the ld. CIT(A), we also found that both the lower...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was levied on additional income voluntarily offered in the statement recorded u/s 132(4). However, no reference was made to corroborative...

Penalty levied u/ss 271(1)(c) and 271AAA for unexplained investment and addition made by adopting net profit as per the books of accounts at 12.85% on the suppressed...

The crux pertains to levying penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for alleged furnishing of inaccurate particulars or concealment of income regarding capital gains computation on sale...

The Assessing Officer (AO) consciously deleted irrelevant portions from the show cause notice, mentioning only the charge of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income....

Levy of penalty u/s.271(1)(c) - estimation of disallowance at 50% of commission and improvement expenditure - in this case, the additions were made on the basis of...

Quick Updates: