Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of bogus purchases ...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Not Justified for Estimated Disallowance of Bogus Purchases Without Sales Doubt.

August 11, 2020

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of bogus purchases by applying the profit rate - Once there is no reason to disbelieve the sales made by the assessee and particularly when part of material is recorded in stock, it cannot be justified that the estimation made by the Assessing Officer warrants penalty under section 271(1)(c) - It can be a case of addition or disallowance of bogus purchases on estimate basis but it cannot be a case of levy of penalty for concealment of income under section 271(1)(c) - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of bogus purchases ...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Not Justified for Estimated Disallowance of Bogus Purchases Without Sales Doubt.

August 11, 2020

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The ITAT Mumbai ruled on penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for estimation of income on bogus purchases. The tribunal held that penalty cannot be levied on additions made on an...

The ITAT Mumbai addressed two key issues in the case. Firstly, regarding the penalty u/s 271(1)(c), the tribunal held that the absence of a tick mark on the notice did...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - estimation of income - bogus purchases - penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act cannot be levied where the addition is made on estimate basis - AT

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Once, all the documentary evidences were produced before the AO and sales are no doubted, it is doubtful, whether the purchases are bogus...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that no penalty u/s 271(1)(c) can be imposed for an ad-hoc disallowance of 20% of expenses made by the Assessing Officer....

Monetary limit for filing of appeal by revenue in case of penalty - Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on bogus purchases - Quantum proceedings and penalty proceedings are...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Addition of bogus purchases - Tribunal in quantum proceedings reduced to 12.5% of such purchases - since income has been estimated by applying a...

This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

The crux pertains to levying penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for alleged furnishing of inaccurate particulars or concealment of income regarding capital gains computation on sale...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Estimation of income on bogus purchases - Once the quantitative details of purchases and the corresponding quantitative sales have not been...

The ITAT held that penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was not imposable on the assessee. The assessee had voluntarily paid tax on income from sale of shares three years prior to...

Penalty levied u/ss 271(1)(c) and 271AAA for unexplained investment and addition made by adopting net profit as per the books of accounts at 12.85% on the suppressed...

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - bogus claim of deduction under Section 35CCA - penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was rightly imposed - HC

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Disallowance of interest expenditure under section 43B as well as disallowance export product development expenses - Just because the assessee...

Quick Updates: