Penalty - smuggling - Merely, because the other persons had ...

Appellant's Involvement in Smuggling Unproven; Guilty Pleas of Others Don't Affect Legal Standing, No Direct Evidence Found.

April 18, 2017

Case Laws Customs HC

Penalty - smuggling - Merely, because the other persons had pleaded guilty before the Trial Court and accepted the punishment, that would not have a bearing on the appellant's position, as there is no direct evidence that he had involved in the said activity of smuggling as there was no recovery from the appellant - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty - smuggling - Merely, because the other persons had ...

Appellant's Involvement in Smuggling Unproven; Guilty Pleas of Others Don't Affect Legal Standing, No Direct Evidence Found.

April 18, 2017

Case Laws Customs HC

You may also like:

Evidences indicate appellant was aware of smuggling activities involving diversion of smuggled cigarettes concealed in transit container, providing transportation and...

Smuggling - illegal importation of the seized gold - Confiscation of the gold and Indian currency - The Tribunal found no evidence linking the seized Indian currency to...

Jurisdiction - power to adjudicate SCN - The High Court rejected the contention that the previous involvement of a Commissioner of Customs in the case's proceedings...

Smuggling of gold - Imposition of penalties u/s 112 - The appellants were intercepted along with their luggage, which was found to contain smuggled gold bars. However,...

Misdeclaration of export goods - attempt to export antiques and other goods from India into Nepal - no legal/ admissible evidence had been brought on record to show the...

CESTAT set aside penalties imposed under s.112(a) and s.112(b) of Customs Act 1962 against appellant for alleged gold smuggling. Court found insufficient evidence beyond...

Smuggling - Betel Nuts - foreign origin goods - town seizure - notified item or not - onus to prove - The CESTAT recognized that betel nuts were not notified items under...

Smuggling - Prohibited goods - confiscation of cigarettes containers concealed in HDPE granules - Penalty u/s 112 (a) &(b) and 114AA - The Appellate Tribunal upheld the...

Levy of penalty u/s 112 (b) of the Customs Act, 1962 - Smuggling - gold biscuits of foreign origin - demand merely on the basis of the statements of the employees of the...

The CESTAT held that the appellant could not be implicated solely based on the retracted confessional statement of the co-accused. The telephonic call between them was...

The term “smuggled goods‟ means goods of foreign origin and imported from abroad. In the present case, there is no dispute that the goods are of foreign origin. As...

Appellant financed an individual for smuggling gold from Dubai and selling it in India. Penalty was imposed u/s 112(b)(i) of the Customs Act, 1962. The Commissioner held...

Customs broker's license revoked, entire security deposit forfeited, penalty levied for contravening Regulations 10(a), 10(b), 10(d), 10(e), 10(f), 10(k) & 10(n) of...

Penalty u/s 112(b)(i) of the Customs Act 1962 - smuggling - Gold Bars - the statements of the co-noticee cannot be adopted as a legal evidence to penalize the accused...

Eligibility for exemption u/s 11 - Section 2(15) and the corresponding sections including Sections 11, 12, 12A and 12AA are independent of Section 10(20A) of the Act....

Quick Updates: