Penalty u/s 114(A) - appellants have wrongly claimed the ...

Case Laws Customs

April 19, 2018

Penalty u/s 114(A) - appellants have wrongly claimed the exemption as the goods imported was not meant for manufacture of optical fiber cable - It cannot be said that the appellants had any mala fide intention of fraudulently claiming the benefit of exemption notification - No penalty - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 114(A) - appellants have wrongly claimed the ...

Case Laws Customs

April 19, 2018

You may also like:

The appellants, who were neither exporters nor Customs House Agents (CHAs), were wrongly penalized u/ss 114 and 114AA for overvaluation of goods for claiming excess duty...

Levy of penalty u/s 112 & 114 of the Customs Act, 1962 - allegation of abating the importer - In present import, there is no evidence to allege that appellants were...

Levy of penalty - filing of the shipping bill fraudulently in the name of appellants - appellants before us are neither the exporters/ owners of the goods - there is no...

Penalty u/s 114 of the Customs Act, 1962 - Penalty on the owner of the godown where goods were reportedly loaded - from the statement of the Appellant herein which...

Re-import of goods - Claim of exemption from customs duty - Whether the original export was under the claim of refund of IGST? - Appellant claimed that at the time of...

100% EOU - Joint filing of import documents by the EOU / EPZ unit and the domestic leasing company - The appellant cannot be faulted if the EDI system did not permit a...

Availment of exemption under Advance License Scheme - Classification of imported goods - goods imported by the appellant qualifies as crude iodine, hence eligible for...

Appellate Tribunal set aside penalties imposed on licensed money exchanger for alleged illegal export of currency and import of gold. Observed no evidence of illegal...

Imposition of penalty u/s 114 AA of Customs Act for abatement - Textile Broker - allegation that appellant facilatated in inflating the FOB value for the purpose of...

Classification of imported goods - Monotype Machine - eligibility of exemption N/N. 114/80-Cus - the machine imported namely Monotype Machine imported by the appellant...

Levy of penalty on appellant u/s 114 (i) and 114 AA of the Customs Act, 1962 - assisting / abetment of export of Muriate of Potash - illicit export of goods - Based on...

Levy of penalty u/s 114(i) of the Customs Act, 1962 - Smuggling - The reason for imposing the impugned penalty is that the appellant has not verified the Let Export...

Classification dispute involving imported SVPS Chillers - whether to be classified under CTH 84198940 or not, and eligibility for exemption notification dated 17.03.2012....

Levy of penalty - Misclassification - nature of imported goods as Dried Garlic or not - Regarding the classification of the goods, the Tribunal upheld the appellant's...

The case involves a dispute over whether imported goods qualify as 'Capital Goods' for exemption under a customs notification. The Revenue alleged that the imports did...

Quick Updates: