Penalty u/s 114(A) - appellants have wrongly claimed the ...

No Penalty for Incorrect Exemption Claim on Imports; No Fraudulent Intent Found u/s 114(A).

April 19, 2018

Case Laws Customs AT

Penalty u/s 114(A) - appellants have wrongly claimed the exemption as the goods imported was not meant for manufacture of optical fiber cable - It cannot be said that the appellants had any mala fide intention of fraudulently claiming the benefit of exemption notification - No penalty - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 114(A) - appellants have wrongly claimed the ...

No Penalty for Incorrect Exemption Claim on Imports; No Fraudulent Intent Found u/s 114(A).

April 19, 2018

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

Penalty of penalty for abetment of the fraudulent export scheme - The appellant was accused of misdeclaration and fraudulent export of ready-made garments in order to...

Levy of penalty - Abetment in Fraudulent export - The judgment by the Appellate Tribunal of CESTAT Bangalore addressed a case of fraudulent export and misdeclaration of...

Levy of penalty on CHA u/s 114 (iii) and Section 114AA respectively of the Customs Act, 1962 - allegation of abatement - fraudulent export to claim duty drawback - The...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Where an assesse has exercised a bona fide right but the deductions or exemptions so claimed are found to be incorrect, penalty would follow only...

Imposition of penalty on CHA - Import of prohibited goods - After finding that the appellant has become unknowingly party to fraudulent import, the imposition of penalty...

Penalty imposed for import of chemicals using fake duty exemption licenses. Appellant claimed exemption under DEPB but used fake licenses and TRAs. Statement of witness...

Imposition of penalties u/s 114 (iii) and 114A on employees / manager of CHA - benami shipping bills - The Tribunal found that the appellant knowingly filed benami...

CESTAT Chennai held that penalty u/s 114 Customs Act was not imposed on Respondents for smuggling undeclared cigarettes concealed with gypsum plaster. Penalty was...

Levy of penalty - Any person - Scope of Section u/s 114 - Intention of legislature is that it can be any other person howsoever distantly relevant to the exporter or the...

Appellate Tribunal set aside penalties imposed on licensed money exchanger for alleged illegal export of currency and import of gold. Observed no evidence of illegal...

Levy of penalty u/r 25 of CER - Penalty on Registered Dealers, Unregistered Dealers and Transporters - Availment of fraudulent credit - issuance of Cenvatable invoices...

Classification of imported goods - Monotype Machine - eligibility of exemption N/N. 114/80-Cus - the machine imported namely Monotype Machine imported by the appellant...

Levy of penalty u/s 112 & 114 of the Customs Act, 1962 - allegation of abating the importer - In present import, there is no evidence to allege that appellants were...

Fraudulent export of low quality goods - Penalty on CHA u/s 114 of CA - appellant held to be equally responsible for the fraudulent export of low quality goods with the...

DEPB license obtained through fraudulent means - the appellants have knowingly committed offence as specified under Section 113(i) and made themselves liable for penalty...

Quick Updates: