Validity of reassessment proceedings - validity of reasons to ...

Reassessment Requires Specific Undisclosed Facts, Mere Repetition of Statutory Language Insufficient for Validity.

July 7, 2018

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Validity of reassessment proceedings - validity of reasons to believe - Mere repetition of the language of the section is not sufficient. It has to be proved as to how and which material facts were not disclosed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Validity of reassessment proceedings - validity of reasons to ...

Reassessment Requires Specific Undisclosed Facts, Mere Repetition of Statutory Language Insufficient for Validity.

July 7, 2018

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - The High Court noted that the extended period of six years for reassessment could only be invoked under specific circumstances, one of...

Reopening of assessment against trust - The aspect that the reassessment is bad as having been made on change of opinion, may require investigation into facts in the...

The High Court held that the jurisdictional facts necessary to invoke Section 147 for reassessment were absent. The reassessment was initiated after the four-year...

Undisclosed income surrendered during search must fall within the definition of undisclosed income for penalty u/s 271AAA to be justified. Assessing Officer must record...

The Delhi High Court examined the validity of reassessment proceedings u/s 147 after a four-year lapse. The court emphasized the requirement of "reasons to believe" for...

Reassessment - disclouser of information - A parrot-like repetition of the statutory language without any substance would certainly not amount to satisfying the...

The High Court held that the reassessment proceedings initiated by the Revenue were invalid due to the absence of any failure on the part of the assessee to disclose...

Revision u/s 263 – IT was not justified in setting aside the order and directing for investigating the facts afresh without pointing out any specific fact which required...

Mere non-payment of duties is not collusion or willful misstatement or suppression of facts - Article

Validity of Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - The Tribunal emphasized the principle that for reassessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, the onus is on the...

The HC allowed the appeal, setting aside the order of reassessment dated 30.05.2018 by the Assessing Officer as being barred by limitation under proviso to Section 40 of...

The High Court quashed the reassessment proceedings initiated by the Assessing Officer u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, holding it to be a case of "change of opinion" and...

The HC quashed the reassessment proceedings for AYs 2013-14 to 2017-18, holding that the findings from surveys conducted in 2007 and 2019 could not be blindly adopted to...

HC quashed reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 147 after expiry of 4-year limitation period. Court found no failure by assessee to disclose material facts...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Plainly, in the facts as noted above, no sanction was required to be obtained at the stage of initiation of reassessment proceedings....

Quick Updates: