The High Court held that the jurisdictional facts necessary to ...

Tax reassessment rejected due to lack of new facts and procedural lapses.

Case Laws Income Tax

August 29, 2024

The High Court held that the jurisdictional facts necessary to invoke Section 147 for reassessment were absent. The reassessment was initiated after the four-year period, but there was no failure on the part of the assessee to fully and truly disclose material facts during the original assessment. The facts relied upon for reassessment were fully disclosed during the scrutiny proceedings in the original assessment. The Revenue is seeking to express a different opinion based on the same disclosed facts, which is impermissible. The sanction mechanism u/s 151 for reassessment was rendered arbitrary due to non-application of mind and mechanical approval without considering the ingredients of Section 147. The court emphasized the imperative requirement of compliance with Sections 147 and 148 and decided in favor of the assessee.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The High Court held that the jurisdictional facts necessary to ...

Tax reassessment rejected due to lack of new facts and procedural lapses.

Case Laws Income Tax

August 29, 2024

You may also like:

Reopening of assessment under old regime - scope of new regime - scope of TOLA - In this detailed judgement, the Court found that the notice issued under Section 148 was...

Levying penalty u/s. 272A(2)(k) - Filing the return belatedly - There may have been procedural lapse on the part of the assessee however, due to such procedural lapse no...

Customs broker's license revocation order set aside due to lack of evidence for alleged violations. Key findings: no proof of misdeclaration or undervaluation to...

CENVAT credit - procedural lapses - whether credit of Cenvat taken on the basis of ISD Invoices issued by the Head Office of the appellant units is deniable for curable...

The Delhi High Court examined the validity of reassessment proceedings u/s 147 after a four-year lapse. The court emphasized the requirement of "reasons to believe" for...

Rebate/ refund claim - case of appellant is that rebate claim cannot be rejected on the ground of procedural lapses such as non-payment under correct category, filing of...

Interest u/s 234C - interest for deferment of advance tax - If on a particular due date for payment of advance tax, the facts show that there is no liability to pay...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed the rejection of the assessee's claim for a lower tax rate u/s 115BAA due to non-filing of Form 10IC on time. The CIT(A) dismissed the...

The case before Karnataka High Court involved the constitutional validity of Section 2A (8-a) of Karnataka Tax on Entry of Goods Act, 1979. The issue was the inclusion...

Export of services - Procedural lapse in submitting the proof of documents - Non-fulfilment of conditions prescribed in the N/N. 18/2009-ST - After hearing both sides,...

Principles of natural justice violated due to lack of proper communication regarding show cause notice and order, leading to tax demand confirmation without petitioner's...

The ITAT Delhi held that denial of Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) claim due to late filing of Form 67 after the due date of filing Income Tax Return (ITR) was not justified....

Section 90 of the Income Tax Act allows relief from double taxation by granting foreign tax credits (FTCs) on foreign income taxed in both India and the other country....

The court held that the Joint Assessing Officer (JAO) lacked jurisdiction to issue notices u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act for reassessment, as per Section 151A read with...

The High Court considered a case regarding refund of Input Tax Credit. The petitioner's refund application was rejected due to lack of supporting documents. The...

Quick Updates: