Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Customs - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights July 2018 Year 2018 This

Jurisdiction - CESTAT - Nothing is placed on record to suggest ...


CESTAT Order Invalid Due to Lack of Authorization u/s 129C(4) of Customs Act 1962.

July 12, 2018

Case Laws     Customs     HC

Jurisdiction - CESTAT - Nothing is placed on record to suggest that, the single member passing the impugned was duly authorized by the President of CESTAT to hear and adjudicate the matter, sitting singly. In absence such authorization under Section 129C(4) of the Act of 1962, I am afraid that, the singe member had jurisdiction to decide the case and pronounce the impugned order.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Deduction u/s 54B - LTCG - Assessee technically may have defaulted in not filing the return under section 139(4). But, however, utilized the capital gains for purchase...

  2. Belated payment of GST after due date of filing return u/s 139(1) - disallowance u/s 43B - assessee's failure to discharge statutory dues by actual payment within due...

  3. HC upheld validity of Rule 36(4) of CGST Rules, dismissing constitutional challenge. Court determined Rule 36(4) derives authority from Section 16 of CGST Act and...

  4. Smuggling - illegal importation of the seized gold - Confiscation of the gold and Indian currency - The Tribunal found no evidence linking the seized Indian currency to...

  5. Customs broker's license revocation order set aside due to lack of evidence for alleged violations. Key findings: no proof of misdeclaration or undervaluation to...

  6. ITAT quashed assessment order passed u/s 143(3) by ITO-4(1), Raipur due to invalid assumption of jurisdiction. The transfer of case from ITO-4(1), Kolkata to ITO-4(1),...

  7. Section 16(4) of the CGST Act imposes a time limit for claiming input tax credit (ITC), restricting it to the due date of filing the return for September following the...

  8. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income - adjustment made u/s 92CA - penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) on the adjustment made u/s 92CA is not...

  9. The High Court allowed the petition, declaring that the petitioner is entitled to authorization to import an additional 8,000 Metric Tonnes of Maize Corn/Pop Corn. The...

  10. Seeks to extend the due date for furnishing the declaration FORM GST ITC-04

  11. The High Court set aside the impugned order rejecting the petitioner's claim of Input Tax Credit (ITC) u/s 16(4) of the GST Act due to a discrepancy between the e-way...

  12. Penalty u/s.271AAB - Belated filing of regular return after search - Penalty cannot be levied u/s.271AAB of the Act, in respect of income disclosed in regular return of...

  13. Recovery of service tax dues - the Department is empowered to recover the dues of service tax of respondent No.4 from the present petitioner, who had purchased the...

  14. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - declaration of additional income u/s.132(4) - due date of filing of return - Once the legislature has not specified the “due date“ as provided in...

  15. CESTAT allowed appellant's appeal for release of 53 kgs of gold seized by DRI. The Tribunal found that the Commissioner's order lacked evidentiary basis, particularly...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates