Trading receipt - refundable contingency deposit representing ...

Court Rules Contingency Deposit as Trading Receipt in Disputed Transactions During Appeal.

June 19, 2012

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Trading receipt - refundable contingency deposit representing sales tax collected in respect of disputed transactions during pendency of appeal before court - held as Trading receipt - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Trading receipt - refundable contingency deposit representing ...

Court Rules Contingency Deposit as Trading Receipt in Disputed Transactions During Appeal.

June 19, 2012

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

HC ruled on tax settlement scheme interpretation regarding admitted versus disputed tax amounts. Settlement Officer erroneously deducted pre-deposit from disputed amount...

The High Court held that petitioners are entitled to pay 10% of the disputed GST amount as a pre-condition for filing an appeal by debiting the amount available in the...

Scope of Deposits - amounts collected by the petitioners for sale of immovable property as advance - would come under the purview of ‘deposits’ or would exempt from the...

The High Court considered a case involving the nature of a receipt received by a company for relinquishing its right to operate a hotel under a license agreement. The...

Manner of making Pre-deposit before filing an Appeal - Utilization of Input Tax credit (ITC) available in the Electronic Credit Ledger (ECL) - The petitioner approached...

Cash credit u/s 68 r.w.s. 115BBE - cash deposit during demonetization period - assessee's failure to maintain books of accounts u/s 44AD. Held that where exemption from...

The High Court reviewed a challenge to an interim order requiring appellants to deposit 20% of the remaining unpaid interest within a specified timeframe. The court held...

Online Module for Filing & Tracking Quality Complaints/Trade Disputes relating to International Trade

Customs Valuation Rules 2007 - Rule 12 allows rejection of declared transaction value and re-determination u/r 9 if identical/similar goods imported at comparable...

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the findings of the Single Judge on the limitation period for a suit. The appellant did not dispute the legal...

Forfeiture of the earnest money deposit by the appellant bank - The Supreme Court held that, the underlying principle envisaged u/s(s) 73 & 74 of the Indian Contract...

The order dismissing the appeal due to non-payment of the mandatory pre-deposit amount u/s 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was challenged. The court relied on a...

CESTAT ruled in favor of appellant regarding refund of Rs.16,14,167/- deposited as pre-deposit under Section 35F. The amount was determined to be a mandatory pre-deposit...

HC set aside the impugned order regarding time limitation and GSTR-3B/GSTR-2A mismatch dispute. The petitioner's willingness to deposit 25% of disputed tax amount was...

Advance tax payment obligation does not apply when assessee claims agricultural land sale proceeds are exempt u/s 2(14). CIT(Appeals) should admit appeal for...

Quick Updates: