Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
GST - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights January 2025 Year 2025 This

HC set aside the impugned order regarding time limitation and ...


High Court Allows Fresh Hearing in GST Dispute After 25% Tax Deposit, Sets Aside Time Limitation Order.

January 29, 2025

Case Laws     GST     HC

HC set aside the impugned order regarding time limitation and GSTR-3B/GSTR-2A mismatch dispute. The petitioner's willingness to deposit 25% of disputed tax amount was considered favorably. Court granted relief by directing petitioner to deposit the agreed percentage within four weeks from order receipt, allowing a final opportunity to present objections before the adjudicating authority. The decision balances tax compliance requirements with procedural fairness, enabling the petitioner to pursue substantive arguments while ensuring partial tax recovery. Matter remanded for fresh consideration upon compliance with deposit condition.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Petition dismissed due to time limitation. Petitioners granted liberty to approach Appellate Commissioner u/s 107 of GST Act, subject to depositing 25% of disputed tax,...

  2. The petitioners' belated input tax credit denial u/s 16(4) of GST Acts overturned by High Court. Orders set aside, cases remitted to Assessing Officer for fresh decision...

  3. The High Court set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter back to the respondent authority to pass a fresh order. This was subject to the condition that the...

  4. Service tax demand on Goods Transport Agency (GTA) services rendered on reverse charge basis set aside as appellant did not collect service tax from service recipient....

  5. Principles of natural justice violated due to improper service of show cause notice (SCN). SCN and impugned order uploaded on GST portal, but mismatch between GSTR-7 and...

  6. Petitioner challenged the impugned order alleging violation of principles of natural justice, being unaware of the order and preceding notices, and discrepancy between...

  7. The petitioner challenged orders u/s 62 of the TNGST Act for failing to furnish returns from April to July 2023 within the prescribed period. The High Court held that...

  8. The court held that even if a debt is time-barred, the issuance of a cheque towards such debt creates a fresh legally enforceable liability u/s 25(3) of the Indian...

  9. The High Court set aside the impugned order of assessment due to violation of principles of natural justice as the show cause notice and the order were not served...

  10. Challenge to assessment order - time limitation. It is not required to dilate on taxability under GST regime from 01.07.2017. Matter requires consideration on merits....

  11. HC set aside the impugned order dated 26.06.2024 concerning GST tax discrepancies. Despite petitioner having already remitted approximately 90% of disputed taxes, court...

  12. Petitioner failed to authorize representative for GST matters after registration under GST regime, resulting in show cause notice being served on auditor without...

  13. Petitioner challenged adjudication order u/s 73 of CGST/WBGST Act, 2017 regarding discrepancies in returns, short payment of tax, and excess availment of Input Tax...

  14. Challenge to assessment order and rectification order for assessment year 2018-19 - mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A/GSTR-2B - order challenged on grounds of...

  15. Principles of natural justice - no notice of hearing - The order impugned dated May 25, 2022 was passed without hearing the assessee and without affording the assessee...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates