Penalty - The plea that substantial benefit should not be denied ...

Case Laws Central Excise

August 18, 2018

Penalty - The plea that substantial benefit should not be denied for procedural lapse is clearly not tenable as there is fraudulent availment of Cenvat credit without supply of goods and it is not merely a procedural lapse.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty - The plea that substantial benefit should not be denied ...

Case Laws Central Excise

August 18, 2018

You may also like:

CENVAT Credit - duty paying documents - Receipt of inputs and used thereof also not in dispute, therefore merely for procedural lapse, substantial benefit of cenvat...

The case involved the Appellate Tribunal addressing issues regarding the scope of Show Cause Notice (SCN) and compliance with Customs notifications. The Tribunal held...

Rebate claim – The procedural requirement of getting goods cleared under DEEC Scheme, examined and sealed by Superintendent, Central Excise is for availing DEEC benefit...

Confiscation - imported four Mercedes Benz cars - restricted goods or not - While recognizing the mandatory nature of the type approval certificate under Rule 126 CMVR,...

100% EOU - Debonding of EOU - if any lapse on the part of the appellant it is mere procedural lapse. For this reason, the substantial benefit of notification no....

100% EOU - the amendment in letter of permission (LOP) has granted to the appellant with the delay, therefore, merely on procedural of lapse benefit of notifications...

Rebate claim – rejection of claim for non-endorsement of the name of the merchant exporter in the CT-I Certificate - substantive benefit cannot be denied for procedural...

CENVAT credit - procedural lapses - whether credit of Cenvat taken on the basis of ISD Invoices issued by the Head Office of the appellant units is deniable for curable...

Denying of CENVAT Credit - Availment of credit on the basis of Advice of Transfer Debit - procedural lapse cannot be considered as a reason to deny Cenvat credit involved - AT

Area based exemption notification eligibility criteria were substantially met despite procedural lapses. Appellants commenced increased production capacity after...

Supply of Goods to SEZ - Rebate claim - Rule 18 - The only lapse of non filing of Bill of Export can not be ground to deny the substantial benefit of rebate claim - CGOVT

Cenvat credit - the substantial benefit of credit on 'Capital Goods' cannot be denied on some procedural ground - AT

Exemption u/s 11 denied - certain mistakes were made in ticking of certain circle - i A typographical mistake or minor procedural lapse cannot act as an estoppel to deny...

The Hon'ble Supreme Court held that a plea of substantial compliance cannot be taken if a clear statutory prerequisite which effectuates the object and purpose of the...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed the rejection of the assessee's claim for a lower tax rate u/s 115BAA due to non-filing of Form 10IC on time. The CIT(A) dismissed the...

Quick Updates: