Imposition of penalties - It is the appellants who themselves ...

Suspicious Goods Reported by Appellants; Customs Department Finds No Penalties Applicable u/s 114.

August 21, 2018

Case Laws Customs AT

Imposition of penalties - It is the appellants who themselves have detected the consignment and intimated to the Custom Department that the consignment is carrying some suspicious goods, therefore, it was 100% examined - penalty u/s 114 is not imposable.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Imposition of penalties - It is the appellants who themselves ...

Suspicious Goods Reported by Appellants; Customs Department Finds No Penalties Applicable u/s 114.

August 21, 2018

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

Levy of Penalty on Customs Broker - pre-condition to restore the license - The case revolves around a Customs Broker who handled the clearance of household goods without...

Levy of penalty u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 on an employee of the Customs Broker - classification of imported goods - The commissioner has recorded as finding...

Levy of penalty - Misclassification - nature of imported goods as Dried Garlic or not - Regarding the classification of the goods, the Tribunal upheld the appellant's...

Mis-declaration: The department issued a show cause notice alleging mis-declaration of imported goods as "printing paper" instead of "newsprint," based on a...

The case involved the reclassification of imported Clear Float Glass (CFG) from Malaysia for eligibility under a specific customs notification. The primary issue was...

Imposition of penalties u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act 1962 on Customs broker - import of used Multifunction Digital Photocopiers and Printers - it is alleged that the...

Demand of Customs Duty - goods allegedly pilfered from Customs Area bonded premises - bonded warehoused goods - The packages were admittedly opened for the first time by...

Appellant financed an individual for smuggling gold from Dubai and selling it in India. Penalty was imposed u/s 112(b)(i) of the Customs Act, 1962. The Commissioner held...

Violation of principles of natural justice - denial of cross-examination - revocation of customs broker license, forfeiture of security deposit, and penalty imposed by...

Revocation of the Customs Broker Licence - The appellant argued that the license had already been revoked once and reinstated by the Tribunal, making the subsequent...

Mis-declaration of value, rejection of assessable value of seized goods, and liability for confiscation of goods and imposition of penalty u/s 111(m) of the Customs Act,...

The case involved a challenge to the imposition of penalties and confiscation of goods under the Customs Act, 1962. The Appellate Tribunal found that the penalties...

CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, considered a case involving penalty u/s 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 on a co-noticee who is a Partner in a Customs Broker firm for...

Levy of penalty u/s 25(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - evasion of duty - The imposition of penalty on both the appellants is un-called for - since Appellant No.1,...

The imported goods, calcite powder, were classified by the department as calcium carbonate under CTH 28365000, while the appellant declared it as calcite powder falling...

Quick Updates: