Imposition of penalties - It is the appellants who themselves ...

Case Laws Customs

August 21, 2018

Imposition of penalties - It is the appellants who themselves have detected the consignment and intimated to the Custom Department that the consignment is carrying some suspicious goods, therefore, it was 100% examined - penalty u/s 114 is not imposable.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Imposition of penalties - It is the appellants who themselves ...

Case Laws Customs

August 21, 2018

You may also like:

Levy of penalty u/s 25(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - evasion of duty - The imposition of penalty on both the appellants is un-called for - since Appellant No.1,...

Proceedings against importer when the sole proprietor of M/s Ganpati Enterprises had expired - mis -declaration and short payment of duty - imposition of penalty on...

Imposition of penalty u/s 78 - based on the records, maintained by the appellant, the short payment of Service Tax on the GTA service was detected by the department. -...

CESTAT Mumbai held that confiscation of imported goods and imposition of penalty u/s 112(a) of Customs Act for forged Special Import Licenses lacked clear evidence...

Imposition of penalty - Demand of service tax - Had the investigation not conducted the said short payment of service tax would not have been detected - demand and...

Imposition of penalty on CHA - Import of prohibited goods - After finding that the appellant has become unknowingly party to fraudulent import, the imposition of penalty...

The case involved the classification of imported consignments u/s CTH 5903 or CTH 5407. CESTAT held that goods were not classifiable u/s CTH 54071094. No...

Levy of penalty - Applicability of the substituted rule for imposition of penalty - The Supreme Court sided with the appellant, holding that the substituted rule from...

Non-discharge of service tax - extended period invoked, service tax demanded - penalties imposed u/ss 77 and 78 of Finance Act, 1994 - appellant providing taxable...

The case before CESTAT New Delhi involved fraudulent registration and utilization of duty-free scrips, leading to penalties. The appellant failed to comply with...

Levy of penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - The appellant contended that the addition made by the Assessing Officer was based solely on estimations, making it ineligible for...

Imposition of penalty u/r 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2022 on the Appellant, who was the Director of Sales and Marketing of the co-noticee Company. The Respondent...

Adjustment of Penalties from Refund amount - After an appellate order allowed redemption of the seized currency upon payment of fines and penalties, the appellant filed...

Levy of penalty equal to 200% - Detention of consignments - quantity of the boxes were lesser than the quantity shown in the document - levying penalty on the entire...

The appeal challenges the revocation of customs broker license, forfeiture of security deposit, and penalty imposed for alleged violations of Regulations 10(d) and 10(n)...

Quick Updates: