The case involved a challenge to the imposition of penalties and ...

In a customs case, penalties & confiscation found unjustified due to procedural errors. Commissioner exceeded authority.

Case Laws Customs

July 4, 2024

The case involved a challenge to the imposition of penalties and confiscation of goods under the Customs Act, 1962. The Appellate Tribunal found that the penalties imposed were not justified as the procedural irregularities did not warrant such severe actions. The Tribunal highlighted that the confiscation of goods was not warranted as the goods were not removed from the customs area without permission. The Commissioner of Customs was deemed to have exceeded authority in imposing penalties and failed to properly assess the breaches. The Tribunal set aside the penalties and confiscation, allowing the appeal.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The case involved a challenge to the imposition of penalties and ...

In a customs case, penalties & confiscation found unjustified due to procedural errors. Commissioner exceeded authority.

Case Laws Customs

July 4, 2024

You may also like:

Smuggling - illegal importation of the seized gold - Confiscation of the gold and Indian currency - The Tribunal found no evidence linking the seized Indian currency to...

Export of Goods - Mis-declaration of Mud additive chemicals for oil well - Confiscation - The Tribunal found that the Commissioner's decision to confiscate the goods was...

The case involved the scope for retention of penalty u/s 112 of Customs Act, 1962 after liability to confiscation was set aside. Confiscation pertains to goods, while...

The appellants, a customs warehousing station, faced a fire incident resulting in the loss of certain goods. The customs duty amount on the lost goods was paid by the...

Appellants challenged confiscation of containers, imposition of redemption fine, and penalty due to inordinate delay in adjudication. Tribunal found procedural lapse by...

The case involved the absolute confiscation of cigarettes with penalty u/s 105 of Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal held that while lack of compliance with Cigarettes and...

Imposition of penalties u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act 1962 on Customs broker - import of used Multifunction Digital Photocopiers and Printers - it is alleged that the...

CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, considered a case involving penalty u/s 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 on a co-noticee who is a Partner in a Customs Broker firm for...

Smuggling - Absolute confiscation of foreign currency seized from the Appellant u/s 113(d),(e) & (h) of the Customs Act - The Tribunal found that there was only a venial...

This case deals with the valuation of 'rough diamonds' imported into India and the subsequent discrepancy between the declared value and the reassessed value by customs...

The case involved jurisdiction for show cause notice and Order-in-Original, penalty u/s 112(a) and 112(b) of the Customs Act, and confiscation of gold jewelry. The...

Levy of penalty u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 - Personal penalty for abetment in evasion of duty of customs - In the context of Section 112(a) of the Customs Act,...

Legal issues regarding the recovery of IGST/customs duty, interest, redemption fine, and penalty in connection with imports made under the Advance Authorization scheme....

Penalty - Confiscation of foriegn currency - carrying currency in excess of prescribed limit - penalty reduced - AT

Levy of penalty - the penalty under Section 26 is inextricably linked to the confiscation of goods as long as there is no confiscation of the goods ordered that there...

Quick Updates: