Penalty u/s. 271D r.w.s. 269SS - No penalty u/s. 271D can be ...

No penalty u/s 271D if loans are accepted as genuine in assessment u/s 143(3) by Assessing Officer.

August 28, 2018

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Penalty u/s. 271D r.w.s. 269SS - No penalty u/s. 271D can be levied on an assessee where the loans have been accepted in an assessment u/s. 143(3) of the Act made by the Assessing Officer as genuine.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s. 271D r.w.s. 269SS - No penalty u/s. 271D can be ...

No penalty u/s 271D if loans are accepted as genuine in assessment u/s 143(3) by Assessing Officer.

August 28, 2018

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Validity of assessment order passed u/s 153(1) - Period of limitation - In this case, since, the Assessing Officer cannot invoke jurisdiction u/s.144C(1) and pass draft...

Validity of assessment u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 144C - the Assessing Officer said that he is passing draft assessment order and the assessee was also at liberty to file the...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Once a query has been raised by Assessing Officer through the assessment proceeding and the assessee has responded to that query, it...

Penalty u/s 271D - receipt of loan / deposit in violating of section 269SS - Assessing officer had not recorded any satisfaction regarding the penalty proceedings u/s...

The High Court held that for levying penalty u/s 271D for violation of Section 269SS, the Assessing Officer must record satisfaction that the provisions were violated....

Validity of assessment order - Assessing Officer himself has not considered the assessment year 2008-09 as covered u/s 153C of the Act. The assessing Officer has issued...

The assessment year in question falls beyond the stipulated six assessment years and four relevant assessment years, rendering the notice issued by the Assessing Officer...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 for addition u/s 68 on share premium received by petitioner from Gold Singapore was challenged. Reassessment proceedings initiated...

The Tribunal held that the assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer was barred by limitation and quashed it. As per Section 144C(13) read with Section 143(3),...

The ITAT Delhi held that the levy of penalty u/s 271D without valid satisfaction for alleged violation u/s 269SS is not justified. The AO must record satisfaction in the...

Validity of Assessment order passed u/s 143(3) - scrutiny assessment - period of limitation specified u/s 153(1) - assessment order framed by the Assessing Officer is in...

Validity of assessment u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 144C - draft assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer was complete assessment order which is not envisaged under section...

Assessment u/s 153C versus 143 - Additions u/s 45 - Underreporting of sale consideration for immovable property while framing the Assessment Order u/s 143(3) - Whether...

Validity of reopening of assessment u/s 147 - AO did not issue the notice under section 143(2) - It is the discretion of the Assessing Officer to accept the return of...

The Appellate Tribunal considered the validity of the reopening of assessment u/s 147 beyond four years. The assessment was based on notes to accounts for AY 2009-10....

Quick Updates: