Demand of differential duty. - the machinery provisions of law ...

Court Rules Duty Demand Cannot Override Statute; Insufficient Evidence for Misdescription and False Statements Allegations.

September 7, 2018

Case Laws Customs AT

Demand of differential duty. - the machinery provisions of law cannot subordinate the charging provisions of the statute. There is no material evidence to sustain the allegation of misdescription and statements.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Demand of differential duty. - the machinery provisions of law ...

Court Rules Duty Demand Cannot Override Statute; Insufficient Evidence for Misdescription and False Statements Allegations.

September 7, 2018

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

A form prescribed under rules can not override statute

The doctrine of prospective overruling is applied when a constitutional court overrules a well-established precedent by declaring a new rule but limits its application...

Since Appellant were paying the duty utilizing the CENVAT Credit they cannot be charged for contravention of the provisions of Rule 4, 8(1), 8(3) & 8(3A) of the Central...

Demand duty - Allegation of import Portland Pozzolana Cement without payment of customs duty - No evidence for actual import of the goods - The CESTAT held that the...

Bogus sundry creditors - Whether CIT(A) had clearly violated the provisions of Rule 46A of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, while admitting additional evidence? - The High...

Recovery of duty drawback already granted - mechanism is absent in Duty Drawback Rules, 1995 thus demand under Rule 16 of Drawback Rules, 1995 is not sustainable.

Clandestine removal of goods denied CENVAT credit. Liability for duty, interest, and penalty from FY 2007-08 to 2011-12 assessed. Differential duty demand of Rs....

CENVAT Credit - Whether the department can demand and recover under Rule 14 an amount under Rule 6(3) (i) equal to 10% of the value of the exempted products? - under no...

The High Court allowed the petition challenging the demand raised by the respondent Greater NOIDA Industrial Development Authority from the petitioner towards GST and...

Misdeclaration of goods regarding value and quantity - goods declared as 'unbranded', but branded caps of various brands like Puma, Nike, Adidas etc. found -...

Refund claim of excess duty denied due to unjust enrichment - goods sold based on LME price index. Revenue contended appellant booked excess duty as revenue expenditure...

The adjudicating authority is bound to explain the alleged contraventions to the person proceeded against or their legal representatives. Rule 4(4) mandates...

Anti-Profiteering - Duties of the Authority - Rule 127 of the CGST Rules, 2017 as amended.

Valuation - adjustment of excess excise duty paid against the short payment - during the relevant period the Appellant had paid the correct duty arrived at in terms of...

100% EOU - demand of customs duty on the raw material imported duty free - removal of finished goods in DTA without having any permission from the Development...

Quick Updates: