Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights November 2018 Year 2018 This

Restoration of appeal - Tribunal cannot accept the amount ...


Appellant's Late Deposit Rejected by Tribunal; High Court's Extended Period for Appeal Restoration Not Honored.

November 20, 2018

Case Laws     Central Excise     AT

Restoration of appeal - Tribunal cannot accept the amount deposited by the appellant after the extended period granted by the Hon’ble High Court for restoring the appeal.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Requirement of pre-deposit - The appellant has not made the pre-deposit and has filed an application seeking waiver because of financial constraints and for the reason...

  2. Addition u/s 69A - unexplained cash deposits in the saving bank - The tribunal found the orders of the Revenue authorities to be arbitrary, with a failure to consider...

  3. Manner of payment of Pre-deposit amount before filing of appeal against demand of service tax - Admissibility of payment of pre-deposit using DRC-03 - The appellant...

  4. Levy of late filing fee u/s. 234E - Due to certain technical error committed (incorrect interchanging of PAN numbers of buyer and seller in online filing of Statement...

  5. The ITAT Delhi considered an addition u/s 69A r.w.s. 115BBE for cash deposited during demonetization as unexplained. The assessee's explanation of cash deposits from...

  6. Interest on the pre-deposit - The Tribunal found that the issue revolved around whether the appellants were entitled to interest on the pre-deposit u/s 35FF of the...

  7. The appellant could not establish the source for cash deposits during demonetization. The Appellate Tribunal held that sales cannot be rejected solely based on higher...

  8. CESTAT ruled in favor of appellant regarding refund of Rs.16,14,167/- deposited as pre-deposit under Section 35F. The amount was determined to be a mandatory pre-deposit...

  9. Recovery of erroneous refund - amount paid by the appellant’s Chennai Unit towards the pre-deposit in connection with an appeal filed arising out of order in Tuticorin...

  10. Stay of demand / pre-deposit - Levy of penalty - Contravention of Section 18(2) of FERA - failure to realize export proceeds - Appellant contended that the order of the...

  11. The appellant's application seeking attachment of a flat in lieu of the mandatory pre-deposit u/s 43(5) of the RERA was dismissed. The court held that the appellant...

  12. The assessee delayed filing the TDS statement, leading to late fees u/s 234E. The Assessing Officer issued an order u/s 200A regarding the late filing. The assessee...

  13. Application for waiver of pre-deposit amount under Section 129E of the Customs Act, 1962 - The appellant has not made the pre-deposit. In view of the aforesaid...

  14. Time limitation rejected as appellant filed protest through letter despite not endorsing 'Under Protest' on Bills of Entry and TR-6 Challans. Appellant, a Customs...

  15. The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the Section 7 application filed by the Appellant, ruling that the share application money deposited by the Appellant with the Corporate...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates