Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Service Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights April 2024 Year 2024 This

Recovery of erroneous refund - amount paid by the appellant’s ...


Appellate Tribunal rules pre-deposit payment not excess duty, grants refund u/s 35F, bypassing Section 11B limits.

April 20, 2024

Case Laws     Service Tax     AT

Recovery of erroneous refund - amount paid by the appellant’s Chennai Unit towards the pre-deposit in connection with an appeal filed arising out of order in Tuticorin Central Excise Division with a different Registration Number - The Appellate Tribunal finds that the payment made by the appellant towards pre-deposit for filing the appeal should indeed be considered a pre-deposit and not an excess payment of duty. This conclusion is supported by legal precedents and the purpose for which the payment was made. The Tribunal agrees with the appellant's argument that since the payment was made as a pre-deposit under Section 35F, the provisions of Section 11B regarding limitation should not apply. As a result, the Tribunal allowed the appeal and granted the company the refund of the pre-deposit amount.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The case involved the issue of pre-deposit during the pendency of appeal, applicability of Section 11B and unjust enrichment, and eligibility for interest on refund of...

  2. CESTAT ruled in favor of appellant regarding refund of Rs.16,14,167/- deposited as pre-deposit under Section 35F. The amount was determined to be a mandatory pre-deposit...

  3. CESTAT denied interest claim on pre-deposit refund made u/s 35F of Central Excise Act. Pre-deposit from 2012 was refunded in 2018 post-favorable appeal outcome. While...

  4. Refund claim of pre-deposit while appeal is pending - adjustment of amount was paid in lieu of pre deposit for filing the appeal before this Tribunal - Since the demand...

  5. Interest on the pre-deposit - The Tribunal found that the issue revolved around whether the appellants were entitled to interest on the pre-deposit u/s 35FF of the...

  6. CESTAT ruled on interest rate calculation for pre-deposit refunds in a clandestine manufacturing case. The deposited amount, once appropriated against demand, acquired...

  7. Refund of Pre-deposit alongwith interest - Adjustment of pre-deposit with pending demand - A pre-deposit would become refundable the moment an Appellate Authority comes...

  8. The order dismissing the appeal due to non-payment of the mandatory pre-deposit amount u/s 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was challenged. The court relied on a...

  9. Manner of payment of Pre-deposit amount before filing of appeal against demand of service tax - Admissibility of payment of pre-deposit using DRC-03 - The appellant...

  10. Refund claim was rejected as time-barred, having been filed beyond the one-year limitation period stipulated u/s 27 of the Customs Act, 1962. The appellant had...

  11. Refund Of excess amount of duty paid on short shipped quantity - Valuation - erroneous calculation of FOB value of the subject consignment - The Appellate Tribunal found...

  12. The case pertains to the interpretation of amended provisions of Sections 35F and 35FF of the Central Excise Act, 1944, regarding eligibility for interest on pre-deposit...

  13. Interest on pre-deposit - payment of duty after reversal of duty debited in DEPB scrips is pre-deposit OR duty payment - there cannot be any duty at all when the issue...

  14. CESTAT dismissed appeal regarding interest claim on refunded pre-deposit u/ss 35F and 35FF of Central Excise Act. Appellant had deposited amounts through CENVAT account...

  15. Interest on delayed refund (of pre-deposit) - relevant time - to be granted from the date of communication of the final order of the Tribunal till the date of grant of...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates