Principles of natural justice - Sub-Rule (1) of Rule 23 of the ...

CESTAT Rule 23(1): Parties can't add new evidence in appeals, but tribunal may allow exceptions for fairness.

December 22, 2018

Case Laws Central Excise HC

Principles of natural justice - Sub-Rule (1) of Rule 23 of the CESTAT Rules states that the parties to the appeal shall not be entitled to produce any additional evidence either oral or documentary - But in specific cases, tribunal may allow additional documents to be produced or witnesses to be examined or affidavit to be filed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Principles of natural justice - Sub-Rule (1) of Rule 23 of the ...

CESTAT Rule 23(1): Parties can't add new evidence in appeals, but tribunal may allow exceptions for fairness.

December 22, 2018

Case Laws Central Excise HC

You may also like:

The Appellate Tribunal examined the reopening of assessment u/s 147 beyond the limitation period, involving the addition of cash deposits in the assessee's savings bank...

The Appellate Tribunal considered TP adjustment on brokerage commission received from related parties. It found TNMM method appropriate for benchmarking the commission...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal deleted the penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) for non-compliance with a notice issued u/s 142(1) during reassessment proceedings....

Rectification of mistake u/s 154 - AO issued notice u/s 154 based on audit objections, adding waiver of principal amount and revising book profit. Tribunal dismissed...

Adjustment u/s 143(1) disallowing revenue expenditure claim u/s 11(1) was made without providing reasonable opportunity to assessee, violating second Proviso of Section...

This case deals with the maintainability of appeals filed by the Airports Economic Regulatory Authority (AERA) against orders of the Telecom Disputes Settlement and...

The High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the assessing officer against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, holding that no substantial question of law...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that every non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) gives a separate cause of action for levying penalty u/s 271(1)(b)....

The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving the levy of penalty u/s 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) due to the Accountant's Covid-19...

This is a case dealing with the interpretation and application of Sections 241, 242, and 244 of the Companies Act, 2013, concerning oppression and mismanagement in...

Section 2(1-A) amended retrospectively to restrict agricultural land exemption to rural areas, introducing concept of "urban agricultural land" under "capital asset"...

The case pertains to the allegation of clandestine manufacture and clearance of structural items/rolled products by the appellant. The revenue's case rested solely on...

Refund of Customs Duty - Duty paid under protest or not - section 27 of the Customs Act, 1962 - The Tribunal held that it is the second proviso to section 27 (1) of the...

Scope of the DTVSV scheme - As under the DTVSV Act, 2020 each appeal, writ petition or SLP is treated as a separate dispute which is evident from Section 2(1)(j) read...

The Appellate Tribunal considered the legality of additions based on a diary seized from a third party. The Tribunal held that the presumption u/s 132(4A) of the Act...

Quick Updates: