Reversal of CENVAT Credit - the Adjudicating Authority has ...

Misinterpretation of Rule 6(3) leads to improper demand against assessee, ignoring legislative options under CENVAT Credit Rules.

January 8, 2019

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Reversal of CENVAT Credit - the Adjudicating Authority has failed to interpret Rule 6(3) CCR properly while confirming the impugned demand. - the demand at 10% /8% as proposed and confirmed is the forced demand denying the option as is granted by the legislation to the assessee.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Reversal of CENVAT Credit - the Adjudicating Authority has ...

Misinterpretation of Rule 6(3) leads to improper demand against assessee, ignoring legislative options under CENVAT Credit Rules.

January 8, 2019

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Disallowance u/s 40A(3) - AO opined that banker’s cheques were not covered in any of the provisions of Rule 6DD of the Income Tax Rules as they were the account payee...

CENVAT Credit - Whether the department can demand and recover under Rule 14 an amount under Rule 6(3) (i) equal to 10% of the value of the exempted products? - under no...

Clandestine removal of goods denied CENVAT credit. Liability for duty, interest, and penalty from FY 2007-08 to 2011-12 assessed. Differential duty demand of Rs....

Validity of demand of service tax - The case involved appeals against an order regarding service tax demands and penalties. The Appellate Tribunal addressed multiple...

If the LAA finds that demand is time-barred, he should only set aside the demand on that ground but cannot advise assessee concerned to discharge the disputed amount...

CESTAT allowed appeal concerning CENVAT credit disputes. Tribunal set aside demand of Rs.1,79,11,286 based on ST-3 returns and credit register differences, noting...

Demand u/s 11D – assessee had issued bogus invoices for 3% commission without supply any goods - demand u/s 11D dropped - levy of penalty confirmed - AT

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi, dealt with a case involving cartelization and bid-rigging in tenders for soil sample testing by the Department of...

Works Contract Service - benefit of composition scheme under Rule 3 (3) - the assessee has not exercised option before “due date of payment of tax” - denial of...

Disallowance of cash payments in excess of prescribed limit u/s. 40A(3) - even though few payments is covered u/s. 40A(3) of the Act, because of peculiar nature of...

Rectification u/s 154 - Transfer pricing adjustments - The assessee carried the matter on appeal to the Tribunal and once again, the assessee never raised any contention...

Scrutiny assessment u/s 143(3) - issuance of the statutory notice u/s 143(2) - Change in address - The assessee submitted that he changed his address and the new address...

Salary income - Taxability of "fringe benefits" or "amenities" provided to employees - Validity of Section 17(2)(viii) and Rule 3(7)(i) - benefit enjoyed by bank...

The ITAT Delhi held that no addition u/s 68 was warranted as there was no abnormal jump in sales, with audited results and profits undisputed. The difference in cash...

Penultimate sale - leather garments - The mere claim of the Assessee that the Assessing Authority had initially allowed such exemption u/s 5(3) of the Act upon due...

Quick Updates: