Clandestine removal - the Commissioner himself having found that ...

Commissioner Rules Computer Printouts Inadmissible; Duty Demand Cannot Be Confirmed.

January 17, 2019

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Clandestine removal - the Commissioner himself having found that the main evidence relied for quantification of duty i.e. computer print outs being not admissible in evidence, the demand could not have been confirmed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Clandestine removal - the Commissioner himself having found that ...

Commissioner Rules Computer Printouts Inadmissible; Duty Demand Cannot Be Confirmed.

January 17, 2019

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Clandestine removal demand based on electricity consumption not sustainable as mere electricity consumption cannot be the sole basis for determining duty liability....

Levy of Anti-dumping duties on import of Mulberries Silk Grade IV A - demand confirmed - HC

Clandestine Removal - demand based on printouts taken from the computer at the factory premises itself during the course of search - , there is no certificate to such...

Classification of imported goods - Narrow Woven Fabric Webbing - The tribunal noted that the appellant's actions in misclassifying goods from a specific country...

100% EOU - demand of customs duty on the raw material imported duty free - removal of finished goods in DTA without having any permission from the Development...

100% EOU - demand of duty - grey fabrics manufactured cleared to DTA units - appellant obtained raw materials duty free i.e. without payment of duty removed...

Duty demand of Rs.15,19,610/- confirmed. Original demand of Rs.2,54,01,776/- not accepted. Appellant failed to counter Commissioner's observations on Annexures II, III,...

Clandestine removal - the computer printouts in the facts at hand do not fulfill the mandatory provisions of Section 36B-(2) & (4) of the Central Excise Act, in so far...

Recovery of duty drawback already granted - mechanism is absent in Duty Drawback Rules, 1995 thus demand under Rule 16 of Drawback Rules, 1995 is not sustainable.

CENVAT Credit - common inputs and input services - it is an undisputed fact that the appellant had reversed the entire amount of Cenvat credit as required under Rule...

The appellant, a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU), imported goods and stored them in a licensed warehouse u/s 58 of the Customs Act, 1962. These goods were destroyed in a...

Since Appellant were paying the duty utilizing the CENVAT Credit they cannot be charged for contravention of the provisions of Rule 4, 8(1), 8(3) & 8(3A) of the Central...

Confirmation of Demand – Self Assessment – Commissioner (A) has confirmed the demand only on the ground that such investigation/verification was not taken up by the...

The case involved valuation of imported goods, undervaluation, admissibility of appellant's statement u/s 108, documentary evidence, computer printouts u/s 138C,...

CENVAT Credit - Whether the department can demand and recover under Rule 14 an amount under Rule 6(3) (i) equal to 10% of the value of the exempted products? - under no...

Quick Updates: