Illegal import into India in violating the provisions of Section ...

Burden of Proof on Claimant in Illegal Importation Cases u/s 11: Prove Goods Are Not Smuggled.

July 13, 2012

Case Laws Customs AT

Illegal import into India in violating the provisions of Section 11 - the burden of proof is either on the claimant or on the person from whose possession the goods were seized, to show that the goods were not smuggled - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Illegal import into India in violating the provisions of Section ...

Burden of Proof on Claimant in Illegal Importation Cases u/s 11: Prove Goods Are Not Smuggled.

July 13, 2012

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

Seizure - Burden of proof - ‘reasonable belief’ - Onus for proving the goods to be not smuggled - Seizure outside the ‘customs area’ - The Tribunal noted that the burden...

Smuggled goods - Burden of proof - Revenue cannot first show laxity in investigation and then seek to shift the burden to prove that the goods are not smuggled - AT

Smuggling - Betel Nuts - foreign origin goods - town seizure - notified item or not - onus to prove - The CESTAT recognized that betel nuts were not notified items under...

Smuggling - foreign origin Gold - burden to prove - The tribunal clarified that the burden of proof under Section 123 of the Customs Act, 1962, solely rested on the...

Burden of proof in case of Smuggling Activity - This discharge of burden of proof, in our opinion, can only happen in cases where there is a reasonable possibility of...

Smuggling - Burden of proof - Confiscation of Silver Jewellery, Silver Boondi & Indian Currency - The Tribunal's decision emphasized the lack of evidence and failure to...

Smuggling - gold bullion of foreign origin - notified goods or not - burden to prove - The appellants have sufficiently discharged their burden of proof in terms of...

Confiscation of goods - Smuggling - foreign origin Betel Nuts - Impugned goods namely betel nuts are not specified under Section 123 of the Customs Act, 1962 and the...

Confiscation - Smuggling of Betel Nuts - discharge of burden to prove u/s 123 of Customs Act - The betel nut is not notified under Section 123 of the Customs Act, 1962...

Smuggling (illicit import) or goods of domestic origin - Betel Nuts - Seizure and confiscation of goods - The goods can be used, sold, re-sold etc. without any duty...

Benami transactions - offence under Benami Act - onus of proving a benami transaction - after amendment, the onus of proving a benami transaction rests entirely on the...

Confiscation of seized goods - The betel nut being non notified goods; burden to prove the fact of smuggling lies on the department and the same has not been discharged;...

Smuggling - Confiscation of gold / gold jewellery - burden to prove - on all the jewellery, there are no foreign markings and hence, there is no reasonable basis to...

10kg of gold consisting of 10 gold bars, with 7 bars bearing foreign markings and 3 bars without markings, was seized along with cash from an employee of the appellant....

Revenue cannot first show laxity in investigation and then seek to shift the burden to prove that the goods are not smuggled especially when there is not even any...

Quick Updates: