Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Customs - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights July 2023 Year 2023 This

Confiscation - Smuggling of Betel Nuts - discharge of burden to ...

Case Laws     Customs

July 4, 2023

Confiscation - Smuggling of Betel Nuts - discharge of burden to prove u/s 123 of Customs Act - The betel nut is not notified under Section 123 of the Customs Act, 1962 and therefore, the burden of proof lies with the department to prove the same. It’s not just enough to prove by negative inference of the documents produced by the appellant on microscopic analysis to find fault. Allegation requires to be proved by cogent and positive evidence. - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Confiscation of goods - Smuggling - foreign origin Betel Nuts - Impugned goods namely betel nuts are not specified under Section 123 of the Customs Act, 1962 and the...

  2. Smuggling - foreign origin betel nuts - Violation of principles of judicial discipline - impugned goods i.e. Betel Nuts and Black Pepper are not the goods specified or...

  3. Smuggling - Betel Nuts - foreign origin goods - town seizure - notified item or not - onus to prove - The CESTAT recognized that betel nuts were not notified items under...

  4. Confiscation of seized goods - The betel nut being non notified goods; burden to prove the fact of smuggling lies on the department and the same has not been discharged;...

  5. Provisional Release of seized Betel Nuts - betel nuts are not notified items in terms of section 123 of Customs Act and as such, the onus to prove that the same are of...

  6. Seizure of goods as smuggled into the country from Myanmar u/s 130 of the Customs Act, 1962. The burden of proof lies on the respondent u/s 123 to show that the seized...

  7. Smuggling - Betel Nuts of foreign origin - The conclusion arrived at as regards the foreign origin of the said goods and the smuggled nature by the adjudicating...

  8. Seizure - Burden of proof - ‘reasonable belief’ - Onus for proving the goods to be not smuggled - Seizure outside the ‘customs area’ - The Tribunal noted that the burden...

  9. Smuggling (illicit import) or goods of domestic origin - Betel Nuts - Seizure and confiscation of goods - The goods can be used, sold, re-sold etc. without any duty...

  10. Smuggling - gold bullion of foreign origin - notified goods or not - burden to prove - The appellants have sufficiently discharged their burden of proof in terms of...

  11. Smuggling of betel nut and black pepper of foreign origin - The Appellate Tribunal observed that while the ARDF report suggested the goods might be of Indonesian origin,...

  12. Smuggling - foreign origin Gold - burden to prove - The tribunal clarified that the burden of proof under Section 123 of the Customs Act, 1962, solely rested on the...

  13. Customs Officers seized gold bars believing they were liable for confiscation under reasonable belief of smuggling. However, the gold was covered under proper documents,...

  14. Smuggling - Seized 2332.800 gm of foreign marked gold - confiscation - Burden of proof - The Tribunal held that the appellant’s have satisfactorily discharged the burden...

  15. 10kg of gold consisting of 10 gold bars, with 7 bars bearing foreign markings and 3 bars without markings, was seized along with cash from an employee of the appellant....

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates