Penalty u/s 78 of FA - the intention of the appellant to evade ...

Appellant Penalized for Intent to Evade Tax u/s 78 of Finance Act; Ignored Notices and Failed to File Returns.

February 1, 2019

Case Laws Service Tax AT

Penalty u/s 78 of FA - the intention of the appellant to evade tax is understood form its very conduct of non-filing of periodic returns and even not answering to the notices sent at least on three occasions - demand confirmed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 78 of FA - the intention of the appellant to evade ...

Appellant Penalized for Intent to Evade Tax u/s 78 of Finance Act; Ignored Notices and Failed to File Returns.

February 1, 2019

Case Laws Service Tax AT

You may also like:

Service tax demand on income shown in Income Tax Return - Suppression of facts and contravention of Act/Rules with intent to evade tax - Extended period of limitation...

Dispute regarding non-payment/short payment of service tax, tax demand and interest u/ss 73(2) and 75, penalties u/ss 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, and extended...

Services rendered by appellant classified as works contract services, attracting service tax liability. Appellant failed to obtain service tax registration and pay...

Appellant paid service tax on entire value of cleaning services, but for remaining services paid tax only on margin money after deducting expenses. Commissioner...

Section 80P deduction claim filed in a return submitted in response to notice u/s 142(1) is valid. The Income Tax Act does not mandate that the return must be filed u/ss...

Levy of penalty u/s 78 - The CESTAT held that, No evidence of positive act of suppression to evade payment of duty. Extended period cannot be invoked without evidence of...

Service tax demand and interest were raised on the amount towards provident fund. Penalties u/ss 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 were imposed. The extended...

Validity of manual revised returns filed - scheme of demerger approved - scheme of arrangement approved by NCLT required Petitioner and Hind Lamps to file revised...

Assessment completed u/s 144 - defective return - Return filed in response to the notice issued u/s 153A it has been stated that the return filed u/s 139(1) of the Act...

Appellant failed to discharge service tax liability correctly, suppressed value of taxable services in ST-3 returns. Department relied on 26AS statement providing...

Levy of penalty u/s 78A of FA - tax not deposited - The authority has miserably failed to distinguish the nonpayment of tax for the reasons beyond the control of the...

Reversal of CENVAT Credit - Banking and other Financial Services - once there is an excess payment, malafide intention that too of tax evasion cannot be alleged qua the...

Extended period of limitation - penalties - intent to evade or not - Once the returns are filed, if Revenue was of the opinion that the self-assessment of service tax...

Non-discharge of service tax - extended period invoked, service tax demanded - penalties imposed u/ss 77 and 78 of Finance Act, 1994 - appellant providing taxable...

Extended period of limitation of five years: Mere non-disclosure of receipts in the service tax return does not automatically mean there was an intent to evade payment...

Quick Updates: