Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights January 2024 Year 2024 This

Assessment completed u/s 144 - defective return - Return filed ...


Assessment Valid Despite Unpaid Tax; Section 139(1) Return Counts for Section 153A Notice, Not Deemed Defective.

January 5, 2024

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Assessment completed u/s 144 - defective return - Return filed in response to the notice issued u/s 153A it has been stated that the return filed u/s 139(1) of the Act is to be treated as return filed in response to notice issued u/s 153A of the Act and when the original return is a valid return though the assessee has not made payment of tax as declared in the return, the return filed in response to section 153A of the Act cannot be treated as defective return. - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Section 80P deduction claim filed in a return submitted in response to notice u/s 142(1) is valid. The Income Tax Act does not mandate that the return must be filed u/ss...

  2. Non-filer assessee had taxable income but failed to file return u/s 139(1), later filed return in response to notice u/s 148 without considering section 50C provisions,...

  3. The Appellate Tribunal examined the reopening of assessment u/s 147 beyond the limitation period, involving the addition of cash deposits in the assessee's savings bank...

  4. Assessment framed without issuing mandatory notice u/s 143(2) by jurisdictional officer. Assessee filed return with Range-1(1), notice u/s 143(2) issued by ITO,...

  5. Notices issued u/ss 84 and 27(1)(a) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 were valid. The time limitation for revising assessment orders is not an issue if a...

  6. Notice u/s 143(2) - period of limitation - defective return filed u/s 139(1) - upon such defects being removed, the return would relate back to the date of filing of the...

  7. Processing of invalid return u/s 143(1) - Denial of exemption u/s 10(23C)(iiiad) - non-filing of ITR-V within 120 days made the assessee’s return as ‘invalid’ being...

  8. Rejection of rectification petition - turnover of the petitioner was erroneously reported in the GSTR 1 return - The High Court acknowledges the petitioner's claim...

  9. Defective return - Rectification u/s 154 - the gross receipt of the assessee from the business carried out by the assessee was not more than to Rs. 1 Crore, therefore...

  10. Reopening of assessment u/s 147/148 - failure to issue notice u/s 143(2) - reopening of assessment is not valid as the Income Tax Department has power to conduct the...

  11. The preliminary assessment u/s 143(1) is limited to processing the return for arithmetical errors, incorrect expense claims, verifying audit reports, deductions, and...

  12. The assessee's case was selected for limited scrutiny under CASS. The PCIT observed that the assessee, along with two co-owners, had purchased an immovable property...

  13. This case involves a challenge to an order of re-assessment under the relevant tax laws. The key points are: The petitioner failed to submit monthly returns within the...

  14. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - When the A.O. admits in the notice under section 142(1) Dated 20.10.2014 that assessee filed return of income under section 148 of the...

  15. The ITAT Chennai considered a case involving a Best Judgment Assessment conducted u/s. 144 due to the assessee's failure to file a return within the specified time u/s....

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates