Penalty u/s 70, 77 and 78 of FA - non-filing of ST-3 return ...

Non-filing of ST-3 Returns: Penalty u/s 78 Set Aside, Sections 70 and 77 Penalties Upheld.

February 9, 2019

Case Laws Service Tax AT

Penalty u/s 70, 77 and 78 of FA - non-filing of ST-3 return would not amount to suppression of facts, with intent to defraud Government revenue, unless it is corroborated with other evidences of malafide intention - Penalty u/s 78 set aside - however, penalty u/s 70 and 77 confirmed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 70, 77 and 78 of FA - non-filing of ST-3 return ...

Non-filing of ST-3 Returns: Penalty u/s 78 Set Aside, Sections 70 and 77 Penalties Upheld.

February 9, 2019

Case Laws Service Tax AT

You may also like:

Non-discharge of service tax - extended period invoked, service tax demanded - penalties imposed u/ss 77 and 78 of Finance Act, 1994 - appellant providing taxable...

Penalty u/s 77(2) of the FA 1994 - delay in filing the service tax return - penalty of ₹ 20,000/- for each return - When the penalty has been imposed under Section...

Extended period of limitation - demand of service tax with penalty - The provisions of section 73(4) of the Finance Act are not applicable because intention of the...

No penalty can be charged for non-filing / delayed filing of ST-3 return in case there is no service tax liability for Such period - But, levy of penalty confirmed for...

Service tax demand on income shown in Income Tax Return - Suppression of facts and contravention of Act/Rules with intent to evade tax - Extended period of limitation...

Penalty - ignorance of law - misguidance by the Consultant - ignorance of law is enough to set-aside penalty under Section 76, 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 - AT

Levy of Penalty u/s 78 - correct value was declared in the ST-3 return but service tax was not paid - The appellant have not suppressed any fact by declaring the correct...

Penalty u/s 77 non submission of ST-3 return - reverse charge mechanism - situation of revenue neutrality - imposition of penalty under section 77 shows the non...

Penalty u/s 77(2) & 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 - The issue is a bonafide dispute of legal interpretation of the newly introduced provision coupled with transaction...

Levy of penalty - in case of confirmation of demand u/s 73(A) there is no application of Section 76 and 78 for imposition of penalty. Therefore, the adjudicating...

Imposition of penalty u/s 78 - there was a bonafide error in not recording the amount in the ST-3 return is seems to be acceptable - penalty waived - AT

Levy of penalty u/s 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 - evasion of service tax - appellant collected service tax from the service receivers but failed to deposit the...

Penalty for non deduction of tax at source - bona fide belief proved - penalty set aside - AT

Levy of penalty for delayed filing of ST-3 return - This penalty of ₹ 4000/- imposed under Section 70 of the Finance Act, 1994 on the appellant assessee does not...

CESTAT determined services provided under "Time and Material Projects" constituted Manpower Recruitment and Supply Agency Service, not Consulting Engineer Service,...

Quick Updates: