Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Service Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights April 2023 Year 2023 This

Levy of penalty u/s 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 - evasion ...


Appellant Penalized for Service Tax Evasion u/ss 77 & 78 of Finance Act; Financial Hardship Not Accepted as Defense.

April 20, 2023

Case Laws     Service Tax     AT

Levy of penalty u/s 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 - evasion of service tax - appellant collected service tax from the service receivers but failed to deposit the service tax amount - The circumstances of financial difficulty in arranging the funds for payment of service tax collected and raising funds for the treatment of her daughter cannot be a ground to invoke Section 80 for setting aside the penalty imposed under Sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994.- AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Non-discharge of service tax - extended period invoked, service tax demanded - penalties imposed u/ss 77 and 78 of Finance Act, 1994 - appellant providing taxable...

  2. Dispute regarding non-payment/short payment of service tax, tax demand and interest u/ss 73(2) and 75, penalties u/ss 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, and extended...

  3. CESTAT ruled in favor of appellant regarding service tax liability on GTA services during 2008-2013. The Tribunal determined service tax liability shifted to service...

  4. CESTAT ruled that service tax demands for rent-a-cab, tour operator, and business auxiliary services cannot be extended beyond normal limitation period due to absence of...

  5. Service tax exemption for services provided to UN agencies and educational institutions upheld. Demand regarding services rendered in J&K and SEZ units remanded for...

  6. Service tax demand and interest were raised on the amount towards provident fund. Penalties u/ss 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 were imposed. The extended...

  7. CESTAT upheld the levy of service tax on renting of immovable property, rejecting appellant's contention that such activity cannot be considered a service. The Tribunal...

  8. Service tax demand on income shown in Income Tax Return - Suppression of facts and contravention of Act/Rules with intent to evade tax - Extended period of limitation...

  9. Demand of service tax from the Sub-contractor - Demand of service tax with interest confirmed - Levy of penalty u/s 77 & 78 waived invoking the provisions of section 80- AT

  10. Even it would not be proper to penalize the appellant under Sections 76 and 78, when the first appellate authority waived the penalty under Section 77 itself - AT

  11. Appellant failed to discharge service tax liability correctly, suppressed value of taxable services in ST-3 returns. Department relied on 26AS statement providing...

  12. Classification of services - Franchise Service or Business Auxiliary Service? - Race Promotion Contract - The CESTAT found that the contract did not constitute a...

  13. Penalty u/s 77, 78 and under Rule 7(C) - delayed payment of service tax - appellant approached their customer and requested them to pay service tax but their client did...

  14. Cargo handling service or manpower supply service was the central issue. The demand raised for service tax on 'cargo handling service' was held unsustainable as the...

  15. Penalty u/s 76, 77, and 78 - service tax with interest deposited before issuance of show cause notice - import of services - Stay granted - AT

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates