Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights July 2012 Year 2012 This

An assessment by way of a settlement order passed by the ITSC ...


High Court Confirms ITSC Settlement Orders Are Final, Cannot Be Reopened by Assessing Officers Under Income Tax Law.

July 21, 2012

Case Laws     Income Tax     HC

An assessment by way of a settlement order passed by the ITSC cannot be reopened by a different authority, viz., the Assessing Officer - in favour of assessee. - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Validity of reopening of assessment - An order u/s 245D(4) already been passed by the Income Tax Settlement Commission (ITSC) - Scope of harmonious construction - The...

  2. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Disallowance u/s 14A - If at all he has considered, he has not even passed the assessment order by ignoring the provisions of law, i.e....

  3. The Income Tax Settlement Commission (ITSC) has the power to pass an order not limited to aspects covered by the assessee's application but can consider issues mentioned...

  4. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Assessing Officer to usurp the jurisdiction to reopen the assessment - The first Assessing Officer has made the reassessment after...

  5. Validity of order passed by the Income Tax Settlement Commission [ITSC] u/s 245D(4) - Learned Single Judge ought not to have set aside the common order passed by the...

  6. The High Court held that the Settlement Commission cannot reopen its concluded proceedings by invoking Section 154 of the Income Tax Act. Section 154 allows...

  7. Formation of belief by the Assessing Officer that income has escaped assessment is the crux of the reopening provision. The reasons recorded must be based on tangible...

  8. The High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the assessing officer against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, holding that no substantial question of law...

  9. The High Court held that the Income Tax Settlement Commission (ITSC) rightly restricted the applicability of interest u/s 234B on the total income disclosed in the...

  10. Final assessment order passed u/s 143(3) read with Section 144C(13) subsequent to Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP)/Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) directions deemed invalid...

  11. Revision u/s 263 - Every loss of revenue as a consequence of an order of AO cannot be treated as prejudicial to the interests of the revenue, for example, when an...

  12. The High Court quashed the reopening of assessments u/s 148, holding that the reasons recorded by the Assessing Officer were cryptic, vague, lacking nexus, and...

  13. AO has passed the impugned order under section 220(2) without giving effect to the order of the CIT(A). It appears that the Assessing Officer has deliberately not passed...

  14. Penalty levied u/s 274 read with Section 270A - assessee computed tax on disallowed depreciation amount at maximum marginal rate and levied 200% penalty on payable tax -...

  15. Validity of Reopening of assessment based on order passed u/s 263 - The Court found that the reassessment proceedings lacked the satisfaction of jurisdictional...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates