Validity of Reopening of assessment based on order passed u/s ...

Reassessment Invalid: Court Rules Notices and Orders Unsustainable Due to Lack of Jurisdictional Pre-conditions.

April 5, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Validity of Reopening of assessment based on order passed u/s 263 - The Court found that the reassessment proceedings lacked the satisfaction of jurisdictional pre-conditions and were based solely on an order that had been set aside by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. Therefore, the notices and order issued by the Assessing Officer to reopen the assessment could not be sustained. The Court emphasized that once a query is raised during the assessment proceedings and answered by the assessee, it is deemed to have been considered and accepted by the Assessing Officer.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Validity of Reopening of assessment based on order passed u/s ...

Reassessment Invalid: Court Rules Notices and Orders Unsustainable Due to Lack of Jurisdictional Pre-conditions.

April 5, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

ITAT invalidated reassessment proceedings due to jurisdictional defects in notice issuance under s.148. ITO Ward 3(2), Bulandsahar transferred assessee's records to ITO...

The court held that the Joint Assessing Officer (JAO) lacked jurisdiction to issue notices u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act for reassessment, as per Section 151A read with...

The High Court held that for a valid reassessment notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, the Revenue must comply with Section 151A, which mandates the issuance of such...

HC held that erroneous attachment of another taxpayer's information to section 148 notice due to inadvertence does not invalidate reassessment proceedings. However, the...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 against non-existing entity - scheme of the amalgamation and arrangement approved - The High Court acknowledges the petitioner's argument...

Validity of faceless assessment challenged due to notice u/s 148 issued by Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) instead of Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO), violating...

The High Court ruled that the Joint Assistant Commissioner (JAO) lacked jurisdiction to issue notices u/s 148 for reassessment of income escaping assessment. The notices...

Validity of reopening of assessment - The case involved a dispute over the deletion of addition on account of undisclosed capital gain and the validity of the assessment...

The HC held that the jurisdictional assessing officer (JAO) who issued the original notices under the old regime can continue reassessment proceedings and pass...

Reassessment action initiated based on Section 148 notice and subsequent Section 148A(b) notice violated the First Proviso to Section 149(1) and was barred by the...

Revocation of customs broker license challenged due to lack of specific allegations in show cause notice regarding violations of Regulations 11(n) and 17(9) of 2013...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Earlier, ITAT remanded the matter back requesting the AO to provide reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings. - AO must have...

HC quashed an ex parte order and related tax notifications due to absence of digital or scanned signatures on both show cause notice (SCN) and final order. Following...

Reassessment u/s 147 - validity of notice - reasons for reopening the assessment have been recorded by the jurisdictional AO viz. the Dy. CIT, Circle 2, Jamnagar but the...

Reopening of assessment under old regime - scope of new regime - scope of TOLA - In this detailed judgement, the Court found that the notice issued under Section 148 was...

Quick Updates: