Initiation of prosecution - Penalty upheld by ITAT - substantial ...

ITAT Upholds Penalty u/s 271(1)(c), But High Court Stay Halts Prosecution Initiation Pending Legal Question Resolution.

March 20, 2019

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Initiation of prosecution - Penalty upheld by ITAT - substantial question of law relating to penalty u/s 271(1)(c) pending before High Court - at this stage, there would no question of launching prosecution - initiation of prosecution stayed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Initiation of prosecution - Penalty upheld by ITAT - substantial ...

ITAT Upholds Penalty u/s 271(1)(c), But High Court Stay Halts Prosecution Initiation Pending Legal Question Resolution.

March 20, 2019

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Levy of Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - The ITAT ruled that since there was no variation between the returned and assessed income, there was no concealment of income by the...

This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that no penalty u/s 271(1)(c) can be imposed for an ad-hoc disallowance of 20% of expenses made by the Assessing Officer....

The ITAT held that penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was not imposable on the assessee. The assessee had voluntarily paid tax on income from sale of shares three years prior to...

The Assessing Officer (AO) consciously deleted irrelevant portions from the show cause notice, mentioning only the charge of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income....

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

Section 271(1)(c) penalty was held invalid due to improper issuance of notice, as no proceedings were pending when the notice was issued on 19.12.2019. Section 271A...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that every non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) gives a separate cause of action for levying penalty u/s 271(1)(b)....

Levy penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - since no specific satisfaction has been recorded by the Ld. Assessing Officer either in the body of the assessment order or in the show...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non recording of satisfaction - When satisfaction for initiation of penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of IT Act is recorded by the AO in...

Voluntary surrender of income by assessee cannot be considered concealment. AO failed to prove concealment, merely concluded voluntary surrender as concealment....

Penalty u/s 271 (1) (c) - Income disclosed only after the search and seizure operation - The High Court emphasized that Explanation 5A of Section 271(1)(c) deems...

Monetary limit for filing of appeal by revenue in case of penalty - Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on bogus purchases - Quantum proceedings and penalty proceedings are...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Specific charge - There was obviously no clarity in the mind of the AO as to which limb of Section 271(1)(c) got attracted in the instant case...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - defective notice - AO is under obligation to specify the appropriate limb of clause (c) of section 271(1) at the time of initiation as well as at...

Quick Updates: