Valuation - The appellant had clearly contravened the provisions ...

Appellant breached Section 4 and Rule 7 of Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000, leading to unjustified duty evasion.

May 2, 2019

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Valuation - The appellant had clearly contravened the provisions of Sec.4 read with Rule 7 of Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000 without any justification and evaded payment of Central Excise duty. The intention cannot be clearer than this.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Valuation - The appellant had clearly contravened the provisions ...

Appellant breached Section 4 and Rule 7 of Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000, leading to unjustified duty evasion.

May 2, 2019

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Method of Valuation - prototype vehicles - goods cleared from the factory on payment of duty under self invoice on the comparable value of the similar vehicle applying...

Valuation - clearance to sister unit - goods were not fully finished - the valuation could not have been done under Rule 9 of Central Excise Valuation Rules 2000 - AT

CESTAT ruled that merely listing an inter-connected undertaking in Income Tax Form 3CD does not establish a "related person" relationship under Central Excise law....

Valuation - Rule 5 of the Central Excise (Valuation) Rules, 2000 specifically provides for exclusion of the cost of freight from the place of removal - AT

Valuation - Rule 8 of Central Excise (Valuation ) Rules, 2000 would apply only where entire production of a particular commodity is captively consumed - AT

Valuation - Job-worked goods - governed by Rule 8 of Central Excise (Valuation) Rules, 2000 or on cost construction method i.e. cost of raw material plus job charges? -...

The CESTAT ruled that the appellant's excisable goods clearance to an inter-connected undertaking should be valued under Rule 10, not Rules 8 & 9 of the Central...

Refund of excess payment of duty - Sale of goods through depot - Valuation - The duty is payable in accordance with the Section 4 of Central Excise Valuation Rules ,...

Appellate Tribunal's decision in identical matter of assessee for earlier period relied upon to dismiss department's appeal challenging determination of assessable value...

Method of valuation - Applicability of most appropriate rule for valuation - it is not the method of valuation that determines the applicability but that the method...

Method of valuation - Rule 11 is adopted when the situation is not covered by any of the other methods of valuation prescribed from Rule 4 to 10A. The method of...

Valuation - inclusion of transportation charges - In the first SCN the value is sought to be determined in terms of Section 4(1)(a) read with Rule 4 and 5 of Central...

Assessable value – As per Rule 5 of the Central Excise (Valuation) Rules, 2000, the transportation charges shown separately in the invoice or charge separately are not...

Undervaluation of goods - FOS and Sucralose when cleared to related parties and M/s Surya Herbals by not following CAS-4 valuation method as provided u/r 8 of Central...

Valuation - goods manufactured by the assessee used by its another unit for captive consumption - Applicability of Rule 8 - upto 30.11.2013, appellants were required to...

Quick Updates: