Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights July 2024 Year 2024 This

Undervaluation of goods - FOS and Sucralose when cleared to ...


Undervaluation dispute resolved: Goods sold to related parties don't warrant Rule 8 valuation if some are sold to independent buyers. Rule 4 takes precedence. No evidence of undervaluation.

July 8, 2024

Case Laws     Central Excise     AT

Undervaluation of goods - FOS and Sucralose when cleared to related parties and M/s Surya Herbals by not following CAS-4 valuation method as provided u/r 8 of Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000. Held that Rule 8 would apply only where entire production of a commodity is captively consumed. Rule 8 provisions will not apply where some parts are sold to independent buyers. In situations where both Rule 4 and Rule 8 apply, by sequential order, Rule 4 takes precedence over Rule 8 for determination consistent with Section 4(8) Central Excise Act, 1944. No evidence of cost comparison or comparable market price provided to show undervaluation. Demand of duty cannot sustain and requires to be set aside. Impugned order set aside. Appeal allowed.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. CIRP - discrimination of Related Party Financial or Operational Creditor - IBC treats related parties as a separate category for specified purposes, excluding from the...

  2. CIRP proceedings - Financial Creditors - Related party - while the default rule under the first proviso to Section 21(2) is that only those financial creditors that are...

  3. The Appellant, a related party unsecured financial creditor, challenged the resolution plan approved by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) and the Adjudicating Authority,...

  4. Refund claim of amount paid under mistake of law - It is also noticed that it is a dispute between the appellant and the builder, two contracting parties. This dispute...

  5. Valuation of imported goods - undervaluation - deemed relationship between GOI, OMIFCO and the Appellants - related party or not - Department has not produced any...

  6. Validity of deed of assignment - Related Party - if the Assignor of a debt is a Related Party of the Corporate Debtor, as per the ratio laid down by the Hon'ble NCLAT,...

  7. Inclusion of name of applicant in the CoC - related party or not - the Applicant is stepping into the shoes of the Assignor and thereby takes over the right of the...

  8. Valuation of goods - Misdeclaration of export goods - the appellants sold the goods of prime quality mis-declaring the same as “rejects” and the same was sold to the...

  9. The Supreme Court held that the lookback period for related party transactions u/s 43 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) is two years before the insolvency...

  10. Addition of interest on interest free loans advanced by assessee Company to sister concerns/related parties disallowed. Onus on assessee to prove commercial expediency...

  11. A recent circular addressed the taxability of loans between related parties or affiliates. The circular clarifies that providing loans between related parties...

  12. Penalty u/s 271AA - failure to make disclosures, as required u/s 92E - as to whether SPMCECL was a related party is an issue qua which there can possibly be more than...

  13. E-auction of assets corporate debtors - who can participate - Scope of the term related party / relative - The expressions ‘related party’ and ‘relative’ contained in...

  14. CIRP - Relating parties - As on the date of it becoming a part of the CoC, Respondent No. 2 was purely a Financial Creditor of the Corporate Debtor and hence, it cannot...

  15. Disallowance towards Client Maintenance Charges - ‘related party’ - ICICI Bank Ltd. does not fall in the definition of ‘related party’ in terms of Section 40A(2)(b) of...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates