Recovery of refund already granted - Commissioner (appeals) had ...

Appeal Outcome: Refund Order Overturned, No Financial Loss or Benefit to Parties Involved, Refund Returned to Customers.

May 18, 2019

Case Laws Service Tax AT

Recovery of refund already granted - Commissioner (appeals) had set aside the refund order - the appellant not only received the refund but also gave it back to the customers. Both sides agree that in this particular case, there is no net loss to the exchequer or gain to the appellant.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Recovery of refund already granted - Commissioner (appeals) had ...

Appeal Outcome: Refund Order Overturned, No Financial Loss or Benefit to Parties Involved, Refund Returned to Customers.

May 18, 2019

Case Laws Service Tax AT

You may also like:

CIRP proceedings - Financial Creditors - Related party - while the default rule under the first proviso to Section 21(2) is that only those financial creditors that are...

Section 53(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) provides for the order of priority in the distribution of liquidation assets. Financial debts owed to unsecured...

Entitlement of Interest on delayed refund - relevant date for calculation of time - In the present case, refund arises only after passing of order-in-appeal by the...

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal held that the Section 7 application filed by the Financial Creditor was hopelessly barred by limitation and dismissed it. The...

Deposits made by assessee in Krishi Bank were fixed deposit investments, not trading activity. Loss suffered when bank went into liquidation is capital loss, not...

Right of department to file any appeal or cross-objections before the Commissioner (Appeals) against Refund order - the Department could neither have filed an appeal...

Refund of CENVAT Credit - alleged lack of nexus - The procedure for claiming such refund, enshrined in notification no. 27/2012-Central Excise Act, 1944 (NT) dated 18th...

Claim towards bad debts - if the provision written back is the excess provision than the money realized, then that would 100% be brought to tax apart from the fact that...

CESTAT held that appellant was entitled to benefit under N/N. 94/96-Cus for imported goods that were initially exported and returned. While the adjudicating authority...

The Appellant, a related party unsecured financial creditor, challenged the resolution plan approved by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) and the Adjudicating Authority,...

The case involves timeliness of appeal filed u/s 85(3A) of Finance Act, 1994 before Commissioner (Appeals-II) and refund claim. The Appellate Tribunal found that the...

Grant of interest in respect of the refund claim already granted - Revenue’s contention is that they have granted the refund within three months form the date of...

Refund of excise duty paid - denial on the ground of time limitation - The Commissioner (Appeals) has wrongly invoked the provision of Clause (ec) for denying the refund...

The Appellate Tribunal affirmed the decision to exclude the Appellant and other unsecured Financial Creditors from the Committee of Creditors (CoC). The key issues were...

Refund of Service Tax - time limitation - Exercise of power u/s 142(3) of GST Act for refund of service tax - The case involves the rejection of a refund claim by the...

Quick Updates: