Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
VAT - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights May 2019 Year 2019 This

Time Limitation - proceedings were initiated under the HGST Act ...

Case Laws     VAT and Sales Tax

May 22, 2019

Time Limitation - proceedings were initiated under the HGST Act - after enactment of the HVAT Act which came into force w.e.f 01.04.2003, the limitation period prescribed u/s 15 became applicable which require finalizing the judgment assessment is three years from the close of the year to which the assessment relates - law of limitation is a procedural law and operates retrospectively - order time barred

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Penalty u/s 271-B – failure to get accounts audited u/s 44AB - penalty proceedings for the A.Y. 2000-01, 2001-02, 2002-03 & 2003-04 were initiated after the period of...

  2. Validity of reopening of assessment u/s 147 - by the time, assessment order for the assessment year 2004-05 was passed on 31.12.2010, six year period for reopening of...

  3. By deciding the question of limitation of AY 2000-01 against Revenue, and by holding that there was no tax liability for AY 2003-04 and AY 2004-05, these two sets of...

  4. Initiation of penalty proceedings u/s 271C and the limitation period for levying such penalty. The key points are: The penalty proceedings were initiated on the date of...

  5. Validity of order passed u/s 201(1)/201(1A) - Period of limitation - prior to section 201 was amended by Finance Act No.2 of 2009, no time limit was provided for passing...

  6. Penalty u/s 272A(2)(g) was levied for not issuing TDS certificates in Form 16A to deductees on time. The issue pertained to the period of limitation for issuing the...

  7. Proper officer - Jurisdiction of Initiate investigation proceedings by the Central GST and State GST authorities simultaneously - cross-empowerment - The Court found...

  8. The court held that Section 6(2)(b) of the Act treats the empowered officers under the SGST/UGST Act at the central level to be at par and does not prescribe for...

  9. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non-compliance of notice issues - if the quantum proceedings itself are declared to be bad in law and quashed , then any non compliance on the...

  10. Jurisdiction - proper officer to issue summons and conduct inquiry - Investigation / Enquiry proceedings initiation by different authorities of state and central GST -...

  11. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - extension of period of limitation from 6 years to 10 years - In plain terms a notice which had become time barred prior to 01.04.2021...

  12. Anti Dumping Duty - When the object of both the paragraphs of the policy is looked into, that brings out difference between the two. Paragraph 4.1.1 deals with normal...

  13. Revision u/s 263 - at the time of exercise of jurisdiction under Section 263, admittedly, proceedings before AAR was pending on the issue of taxability of receipts from...

  14. The High Court held that once a proper officer initiates proceedings on a subject matter under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act) or the Haryana...

  15. LTCG - cost of acquisition of shares - Since the assessee has not submitted Balance Sheet as on 1st April 1981 of the company M/s. Somani & Co. Pvt. Ltd., in our...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates