The case pertains to the jurisdiction of impugned orders under ...

High Court quashes tax orders issued beyond prescribed time limit, unfreezes accounts.

Case Laws GST

November 20, 2024

The case pertains to the jurisdiction of impugned orders under the U.P.G.S.T. Act, 2017, and the time limitation u/s 73 and Section 44 of the Act. The key points are: the retrospective effect of notifications, the time limit prescribed for issuing orders u/s 73(9) based on the due date of filing annual returns u/s 44(1), and the validity of the impugned orders in light of this time limit. The due date for filing the annual return for the financial year 2017-18 was extended to 05.02.2020 via notifications. Consequently, the three-year time limit u/s 73(10) for issuing orders ended on 05.02.2023. However, the impugned orders were dated 05.10.2024 and 02.12.2023, beyond the prescribed time limit. Therefore, the High Court held that the impugned orders were beyond jurisdiction, being barred by the time limit u/s 73(10). Consequently, the writ petition was allowed, the impugned orders were quashed, and the petitioner's frozen accounts were ordered to be de-frozen.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The case pertains to the jurisdiction of impugned orders under ...

High Court quashes tax orders issued beyond prescribed time limit, unfreezes accounts.

Case Laws GST

November 20, 2024

You may also like:

Time limit to pass assessment u/s. 92CA(3) - Transfer pricing adjustments - After thorough consideration of the statutory provisions and legal arguments presented by...

Limitation for passing a assessment order - Consequential order passed by the assessing authority beyond the time limit specified u/s 153 (2A) - The High Court examined...

Impugned proceedings u/s 147 were held invalid as the notice u/s 148 was issued beyond the time limit prescribed u/s 149. The Tribunal interpreted the amended provisions...

Prescribed Time Limit - Relaxation of Certain Provisions of Specified Act - Time limit for issuing notices, passing orders, filing of ITR and returns etc. - Notification

The notice u/s 143(2) of the Income Tax Act was issued on 15.10.2013, beyond the prescribed time limit of six months from the end of the assessment year, i.e., 30.9.2013....

The issue pertained to the validity of filing a revised return after the prescribed time limit. The High Court set aside the Tribunal's order, stating that after the...

Limit limit to pass order u/s. 201(1)/201(1A) - default for non-deduction of tax at source (TDS) - A subsequent amendment to the provision cannot give a new lease of...

Wealth tax assessment - Notice itself has been issued beyond the time prescribed u/s 16(2) of the Wealth Tax Act. Thus, according to us the provision of section 42 does...

The High Court examined the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer (AO) and the prescribed income-tax authority to issue notices u/s 143(2) of the Income Tax Act. It held...

The Appellate Tribunal considered the validity of final assessment orders passed beyond the limit set by section 144C(13). It was held that the Assessing Officer (AO)...

Validity of order beyond the scope of Show cause notice - Statutory time limit for filing of appeal already expired - Though the impugned order was passed on 10.05.2022...

The case pertains to the scope of limited scrutiny by the assessing officer regarding computation of capital gains u/s 45 and providing exemption u/s 54B of the Income...

The High Court held that the delay in issuing the tax refund was subject to the strict limitation period prescribed u/s 254 read with Section 153(3). The Assessing...

Assessee company failed to deduct tax at source as reflected in Tax Auditor's report. Demand u/s 201(1)/201(14) was barred by limitation. Assessee submitted that...

No time limit prescribed u/s 279(2) of Income Tax Act for filing compounding application. CBDT circular fixing 36-month limitation period held contrary to the Act and...

Quick Updates: